# Propensity Score Alignment of Unpaired Multimodal Data

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01595 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01595/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Apr 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.03748/) (2018)
- [Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06377/) (2021)
- [Unsupervised Image-to-Image Translation Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.00848/) (2017)
- [Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.04809/) (2019)
- [Learning Generative Models with Sinkhorn Divergences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.00292/) (2017)
- [TrajectoryNet: A Dynamic Optimal Transport Network for Modeling Cellular Dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.04461/) (2020)
- [Interventional Causal Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11924/) (2022)
- [Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00542/) (2023)
- [Learning Linear Causal Representations from Interventions under General Nonlinear Mixing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02235/) (2023)
- [The Incomplete Rosetta Stone Problem: Identifiability Results for Multi-View Nonlinear ICA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.06642/) (2019)
- [Linear Causal Disentanglement via Interventions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.16467/) (2022)
- [Augmented CycleGAN: Learning Many-to-Many Mappings from Unpaired Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.10151/) (2018)
- [Indeterminacy in Generative Models: Characterization and Strong Identifiability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00801/) (2022)
- [Unpaired Multi-Domain Causal Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00993/) (2023)
- [MAGAN: Aligning Biological Manifolds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.00385/) (2018)
- [Masked Autoencoders are Scalable Learners of Cellular Morphology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16064/) (2023)
- [Contrastive Mixture of Posteriors for Counterfactual Inference, Data Integration and Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.08161/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Learning Shared Representations from Unpaired Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21524/) (2025)
- [Learning to Match Unpaired Data with Minimum Entropy Coupling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08501/) (2025)
- [A Cross Modal Knowledge Distillation & Data Augmentation Recipe for Improving Transcriptomics Representations through Morphological Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21317/) (2025)
- [Linear causal disentanglement via higher-order cumulants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04605/) (2024)
- [Amplifying Prominent Representations in Multimodal Learning via Variational Dirichlet Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.20736/) (2025)
- [Group Contrastive Learning for Weakly Paired Multimodal Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04021/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal representation learning techniques typically rely on paired samples to learn common representations, but paired samples are challenging to collect in fields such as biology where measurement devices often destroy the samples. This paper presents an approach to address the challenge of aligning unpaired samples across disparate modalities in multimodal representation learning. We draw an analogy between potential outcomes in causal inference and potential views in multimodal observations, which allows us to use Rubin's framework to estimate a common space in which to match samples. Our approach assumes we collect samples that are experimentally perturbed by treatments, and uses this to estimate a propensity score from each modality, which encapsulates all shared information between a latent state and treatment and can be used to define a distance between samples. We experiment with two alignment techniques that leverage this distance -- shared nearest neighbours (SNN) and optimal transport (OT) matching -- and find that OT matching results in significant improvements over state-of-the-art alignment approaches in both a synthetic multi-modal setting and in real-world data from NeurIPS Multimodal Single-Cell Integration Challenge.
