# Token-Efficient Leverage Learning in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.00914 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00914/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 25 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14314/) (2023)
- [Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11416/) (2022)
- [Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02789/) (2018)
- [Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12837/) (2022)
- [Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09690/) (2021)
- [AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06364/) (2023)
- [RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00267/) (2023)
- [Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.15004/) (2023)
- [HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11747/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Are Reasoning Teachers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10071/) (2022)
- [Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of their Prompts?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01247/) (2021)
- [Revisiting Few-sample BERT Fine-tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05987/) (2020)
- [How Abilities in Large Language Models are Affected by Supervised Fine-tuning Data Composition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05492/) (2023)
- [Better Fine-Tuning by Reducing Representational Collapse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.03156/) (2020)
- [Platypus: Quick, Cheap, and Powerful Refinement of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07317/) (2023)
- [The Quantization Model of Neural Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13506/) (2023)
- [Learning Compact Metrics for MT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06341/) (2021)
- [The unreasonable effectiveness of few-shot learning for machine translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.01398/) (2023)
- [ChatHome: Development and Evaluation of a Domain-Specific Language Model for Home Renovation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15290/) (2023)
- [A Comparative Study between Full-Parameter and LoRA-based Fine-Tuning on Chinese Instruction Data for Instruction Following Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08109/) (2023)
- [How to Fine-tune Models with Few Samples: Update, Data Augmentation, and Test-time Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07874/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Xiaomi MiMo-VL-Miloco Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.17436/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning-Guided Chain-of-Draft for Token-Efficient Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.25243/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have excelled in various tasks but perform better in high-resource scenarios, which presents challenges in low-resource scenarios. Data scarcity and the inherent difficulty of adapting LLMs to specific tasks compound the challenge. To address the twin hurdles, we introduce Leverage Learning. We present a streamlined implement of this methodology called Token-Efficient Leverage Learning (TELL). TELL showcases the potential of Leverage Learning, demonstrating effectiveness across various LLMs and low-resource tasks, ranging from 104 to 106 tokens. It reduces task data requirements by up to nearly an order of magnitude compared to conventional Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) while delivering competitive performance. With the same amount of task data, TELL leads in improving task performance compared to SFT. We discuss the mechanism of Leverage Learning, suggesting it aligns with quantization hypothesis and explore its promising potential through empirical testing.
