# A Causal Analysis of CO2 Reduction Strategies in Electricity Markets Through Machine Learning-Driven Metalearners

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15499 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.15499/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03461/) (2017)
- [Quasi-Oracle Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.04912/) (2017)
- [Learning Representations for Counterfactual Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.03661/) (2016)
- [Generalized Random Forests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.01271/) (2016)
- [Discussion on "Bayesian Regression Tree Models for Causal Inference: Regularization, Confounding, and Heterogeneous Effects" by Hahn, Murray and Carvalho](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.02836/) (2021)
- [CausalML: Python Package for Causal Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.11631/) (2020)
- [Forecasting day-ahead electricity prices in Europe: the importance of considering market integration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07061/) (2017)
- [Causal Etiology of the Research of James M. Robins](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02894/) (2015)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This study employs the Causal Machine Learning (CausalML) statistical method to analyze the influence of electricity pricing policies on carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in the household sector. Investigating the causality between potential outcomes and treatment effects, where changes in pricing policies are the treatment, our analysis challenges the conventional wisdom surrounding incentive-based electricity pricing. The study's findings suggest that adopting such policies may inadvertently increase CO2 intensity. Additionally, we integrate a machine learning-based meta-algorithm, reflecting a contemporary statistical approach, to enhance the depth of our causal analysis. The study conducts a comparative analysis of learners X, T, S, and R to ascertain the optimal methods based on the defined question's specified goals and contextual nuances. This research contributes valuable insights to the ongoing dialogue on sustainable development practices, emphasizing the importance of considering unintended consequences in policy formulation.
