# Integrating Supervised Extractive and Generative Language Models for Suicide Risk Evidence Summarization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15478 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.15478/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Characterization of Time-variant and Time-invariant Assessment of Suicidality on Reddit using C-SSRS](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.04140/) (2021)
- [Cheap Ways of Extracting Clinical Markers from Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.11227/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Beyond Risk Prediction: Evidence Grounding and Psychosocial Factor Verification for Explainable Suicide Risk Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.08842/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a method that integrates supervised extractive and generative language models for providing supporting evidence of suicide risk in the CLPsych 2024 shared task. Our approach comprises three steps. Initially, we construct a BERT-based model for estimating sentence-level suicide risk and negative sentiment. Next, we precisely identify high suicide risk sentences by emphasizing elevated probabilities of both suicide risk and negative sentiment. Finally, we integrate generative summaries using the MentaLLaMa framework and extractive summaries from identified high suicide risk sentences and a specialized dictionary of suicidal risk words. SophiaADS, our team, achieved 1st place for highlight extraction and ranked 10th for summary generation, both based on recall and consistency metrics, respectively.
