# Thought Graph: Generating Thought Process for Biological Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07144 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07144/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Clinical and biomedical applications, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 9 of its 12 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Clinical and biomedical applications](https://mlsanity.com/lr/clinical-and-biomedical-applications/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10601/) (2023)
- [Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10625/) (2022)
- [Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09687/) (2023)
- [Self-Alignment Pretraining for Biomedical Entity Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11784/) (2020)
- [Can Knowledge Graphs Reduce Hallucinations in LLMs? : A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07914/) (2023)
- [MindMap: Knowledge Graph Prompting Sparks Graph of Thoughts in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09729/) (2023)
- [Evaluation of large language models for discovery of gene set function](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.04019/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [A Survey of Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Customized Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13958/) (2025)
- [Graphs Meet AI Agents: Taxonomy, Progress, and Future Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18019/) (2025)
- [Graph-Augmented Large Language Model Agents: Current Progress and Future Prospects](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.21407/) (2025)
- [Contextualizing biological perturbation experiments through language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.21290/) (2025)
- [Time Matters: Examine Temporal Effects on Biomedical Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.17638/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models Meet Text-Attributed Graphs: A Survey of Integration Frameworks and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.21131/) (2025)
- [Examining Imbalance Effects on Performance and Demographic Fairness of Clinical Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.17803/) (2024)
- [Incorporating Spatial Information into Goal-Conditioned Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning via Graph Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.10872/) (2025)
- [BrainMAP: Learning Multiple Activation Pathways in Brain Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.17404/) (2024)
- [Knowledge-Augmented Long-CoT Generation for Complex Biomolecular Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.08024/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present the Thought Graph as a novel framework to support complex reasoning and use gene set analysis as an example to uncover semantic relationships between biological processes. Our framework stands out for its ability to provide a deeper understanding of gene sets, significantly surpassing GSEA by 40.28% and LLM baselines by 5.38% based on cosine similarity to human annotations. Our analysis further provides insights into future directions of biological processes naming, and implications for bioinformatics and precision medicine.
