# Interpreting What Typical Fault Signals Look Like via Prototype-matching

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07033 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07033/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 53 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.05175/) (2017)
- [This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.10574/) (2018)
- [A Survey on Neural Network Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.14261/) (2020)
- [Deep Learning for Case-Based Reasoning through Prototypes: A Neural Network that Explains Its Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.04806/) (2017)
- [Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.04840/) (2021)
- [Fully Learnable Deep Wavelet Transform for Unsupervised Monitoring of High-Frequency Time Series](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.00899/) (2021)
- [Deep Learning Algorithms for Rotating Machinery Intelligent Diagnosis: An Open Source Benchmark Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.03315/) (2020)
- [TFN: An Interpretable Neural Network with Time-Frequency Transform Embedded for Intelligent Fault Diagnosis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.01992/) (2022)
- [Deep Prototypical Networks Based Domain Adaptation for Fault Diagnosis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03688/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [CS-SHAP: Extending SHAP to Cyclic-Spectral Domain for Better Interpretability of Intelligent Fault Diagnosis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06424/) (2025)
- [SHapley Estimated Explanation (SHEP): A Fast Post-Hoc Attribution Method for Interpreting Intelligent Fault Diagnosis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.03773/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks, with powerful nonlinear mapping and classification capabilities, are widely applied in mechanical fault diagnosis to ensure safety. However, being typical black-box models, their application is limited in high-reliability-required scenarios. To understand the classification logic and explain what typical fault signals look like, the prototype matching network (PMN) is proposed by combining the human-inherent prototype-matching with autoencoder (AE). The PMN matches AE-extracted feature with each prototype and selects the most similar prototype as the prediction result. It has three interpreting paths on classification logic, fault prototypes, and matching contributions. Conventional diagnosis and domain generalization experiments demonstrate its competitive diagnostic performance and distinguished advantages in representation learning. Besides, the learned typical fault signals (i.e., sample-level prototypes) showcase the ability for denoising and extracting subtle key features that experts find challenging to capture. This ability broadens human understanding and provides a promising solution from interpretability research to AI-for-Science.
