# Authorship and the Politics and Ethics of LLM Watermarks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06593 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06593/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 11 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Watermarking generated content and models](https://mlsanity.com/safety/watermarking-generated-content-and-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04356/) (2022)
- [Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.04359/) (2021)
- [A Watermark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10226/) (2023)
- [Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15593/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Text Watermarking in the Era of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.07913/) (2023)
- [Watermarks in the Sand: Impossibility of Strong Watermarking for Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04378/) (2023)
- [Publicly-Detectable Watermarking for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18491/) (2023)
- [ChatGPT vs Human-authored Text: Insights into Controllable Text Summarization and Sentence Style Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07799/) (2023)
- [The Ethical Need for Watermarks in Machine-Generated Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03118/) (2022)
- [Group Fairness: Independence Revisited](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.02968/) (2021)
- [The Stable Entropy Hypothesis and Entropy-Aware Decoding: An Analysis and Algorithm for Robust Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06784/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [CATMark: A Context-Aware Thresholding Framework for Robust Cross-Task Watermarking in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.02342/) (2025)
- [A Visual Semantic Adaptive Watermark grounded by Prefix-Tuning for Large Vision-Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.07291/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, watermarking schemes for large language models (LLMs) have been proposed to distinguish text generated by machines and by humans. The present paper explores philosophical, political, and ethical ramifications of implementing and using watermarking schemes. A definition of authorship that includes both machines (LLMs) and humans is proposed to serve as a backdrop. It is argued that private watermarks may provide private companies with sweeping rights to determine authorship, which is incompatible with traditional standards of authorship determination. Then, possible ramifications of the so-called entropy dependence of watermarking mechanisms are explored. It is argued that entropy may vary for different, socially salient groups. This could lead to group dependent rates at which machine generated text is detected. Specifically, groups more interested in low entropy text may face the challenge that it is harder to detect machine generated text that is of interest to them.