# ROUGE-K: Do Your Summaries Have Keywords?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05186 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05186/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 25 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13461/) (2019)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.08745/) (2018)
- [Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehend](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03340/) (2015)
- [SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12626/) (2020)
- [Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12840/) (2019)
- [Text Summarization with Pretrained Encoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.08345/) (2019)
- [A Neural Attention Model for Abstractive Sentence Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.00685/) (2015)
- [News Summarization and Evaluation in the Era of GPT-3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.12356/) (2022)
- [QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12693/) (2021)
- [QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08542/) (2021)
- [WikiLingua: A New Benchmark Dataset for Cross-Lingual Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03093/) (2020)
- [TLDR: Extreme Summarization of Scientific Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.15011/) (2020)
- [GSum: A General Framework for Guided Neural Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08014/) (2020)
- [Entity-level Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09130/) (2021)
- [ScisummNet: A Large Annotated Corpus and Content-Impact Models for Scientific Paper Summarization with Citation Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.01716/) (2019)
- [Better Summarization Evaluation with Word Embeddings for ROUGE](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.06034/) (2015)
- [Question Answering as an Automatic Evaluation Metric for News Article Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00318/) (2019)
- [SacreROUGE: An Open-Source Library for Using and Developing Summarization Evaluation Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.05374/) (2020)
- [Abstractive Summarization with Combination of Pre-trained Sequence-to-Sequence and Saliency Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.13028/) (2020)
- [X-SCITLDR: Cross-Lingual Extreme Summarization of Scholarly Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.15051/) (2022)
- [Are All the Datasets in Benchmark Necessary? A Pilot Study of Dataset Evaluation for Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.02129/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Do We Need Bigger Models for Science? Task-Aware Retrieval with Small Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.01965/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Keywords, that is, content-relevant words in summaries play an important role in efficient information conveyance, making it critical to assess if system-generated summaries contain such informative words during evaluation. However, existing evaluation metrics for extreme summarization models do not pay explicit attention to keywords in summaries, leaving developers ignorant of their presence. To address this issue, we present a keyword-oriented evaluation metric, dubbed ROUGE-K, which provides a quantitative answer to the question of -- textitHow well do summaries include keywords? Through the lens of this keyword-aware metric, we surprisingly find that a current strong baseline model often misses essential information in their summaries. Our analysis reveals that human annotators indeed find the summaries with more keywords to be more relevant to the source documents. This is an important yet previously overlooked aspect in evaluating summarization systems. Finally, to enhance keyword inclusion, we propose four approaches for incorporating word importance into a transformer-based model and experimentally show that it enables guiding models to include more keywords while keeping the overall quality. Our code is released at https://github.com/sobamchan/rougek.