# Enhancing Instructional Quality: Leveraging Computer-Assisted Textual Analysis to Generate In-Depth Insights from Educational Artifacts

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03920 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03920/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.04359/) (2021)
- [PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05087/) (2023)
- [Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.04325/) (2022)
- [A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.03494/) (2023)
- [Red teaming ChatGPT via Jailbreaking: Bias, Robustness, Reliability and Toxicity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12867/) (2023)
- [ChatGPT is not all you need. A State of the Art Review of large Generative AI models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.04655/) (2023)
- [GPT Can Solve Mathematical Problems Without a Calculator](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.03241/) (2023)
- [Fine-tuning ChatGPT for Automatic Scoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10072/) (2023)
- [Machine Learning Model Sizes and the Parameter Gap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.02852/) (2022)
- [Is ChatGPT a Good Teacher Coach? Measuring Zero-Shot Performance For Scoring and Providing Actionable Insights on Classroom Instruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03090/) (2023)
- [Personalized Education in the AI Era: What to Expect Next?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.10074/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper explores the transformative potential of computer-assisted textual analysis in enhancing instructional quality through in-depth insights from educational artifacts. We integrate Richard Elmore's Instructional Core Framework to examine how artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods, particularly natural language processing (NLP), can analyze educational content, teacher discourse, and student responses to foster instructional improvement. Through a comprehensive review and case studies within the Instructional Core Framework, we identify key areas where AI/ML integration offers significant advantages, including teacher coaching, student support, and content development. We unveil patterns that indicate AI/ML not only streamlines administrative tasks but also introduces novel pathways for personalized learning, providing actionable feedback for educators and contributing to a richer understanding of instructional dynamics. This paper emphasizes the importance of aligning AI/ML technologies with pedagogical goals to realize their full potential in educational settings, advocating for a balanced approach that considers ethical considerations, data quality, and the integration of human expertise.