# Neural Exec: Learning (and Learning from) Execution Triggers for Prompt Injection Attacks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03792 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03792/

## Key facts

- Cited by 85 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompt injection and agent security, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 15 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Prompt injection and agent security](https://mlsanity.com/safety/prompt-injection-and-agent-security/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Mistral 7B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06825/) (2023)
- [Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02483/) (2023)
- [Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.03822/) (2018)
- [Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12173/) (2023)
- [Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08419/) (2023)
- [Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09527/) (2022)
- [Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07125/) (2019)
- [Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05499/) (2023)
- [Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15447/) (2023)
- [AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.15980/) (2020)
- [Professor Forcing: A New Algorithm for Training Recurrent Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.09038/) (2016)
- [InstructZero: Efficient Instruction Optimization for Black-Box Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.03082/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 85)

- [Defeating Prompt Injections by Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18813/) (2025)
- [SecAlign: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05451/) (2024)
- [AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13352/) (2024)
- [DataSentinel: A Game-Theoretic Detection of Prompt Injection Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11358/) (2025)
- [ContextCite: Attributing Model Generation to Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.00729/) (2024)
- [Attention Tracker: Detecting Prompt Injection Attacks in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00348/) (2024)
- [Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.10102/) (2024)
- [Can LLMs Separate Instructions From Data? And What Do We Even Mean By That?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06833/) (2024)
- [Get my drift? Catching LLM Task Drift with Activation Deltas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00799/) (2024)
- [Imprompter: Tricking LLM Agents into Improper Tool Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14923/) (2024)
- [DRIFT: Dynamic Rule-Based Defense with Injection Isolation for Securing LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12104/) (2025)
- [Navigating the Risks: A Survey of Security, Privacy, and Ethics Threats in LLM-Based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.09523/) (2024)
- [LLMmap: Fingerprinting For Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15847/) (2024)
- [ACE: A Security Architecture for LLM-Integrated App Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.20984/) (2025)
- [Multi-Agent Systems Execute Arbitrary Malicious Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.12188/) (2025)
- [Phantom: General Backdoor Attacks on Retrieval Augmented Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20485/) (2024)
- [InjecGuard: Benchmarking and Mitigating Over-defense in Prompt Injection Guardrail Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.22770/) (2024)
- [AttriGuard: Defeating Indirect Prompt Injection in LLM Agents via Causal Attribution of Tool Invocations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.10749/) (2026)
- [A Critical Evaluation of Defenses against Prompt Injection Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18333/) (2025)
- [RL Is a Hammer and LLMs Are Nails: A Simple Reinforcement Learning Recipe for Strong Prompt Injection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04885/) (2025)
- [Defending Against Prompt Injection with DataFilter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19207/) (2025)
- [Defending Against Prompt Injection With a Few DefensiveTokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.07974/) (2025)
- [Security Concerns for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18889/) (2025)
- [PromptLocate: Localizing Prompt Injection Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.12252/) (2025)
- [Real AI Agents with Fake Memories: Fatal Context Manipulation Attacks on Web3 Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16248/) (2025)
- [Enhancing Prompt Injection Attacks to LLMs via Poisoning Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14827/) (2024)
- [GASLITEing the Retrieval: Exploring Vulnerabilities in Dense Embedding-based Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.20953/) (2024)
- [PIShield: Detecting Prompt Injection Attacks via Intrinsic LLM Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.14005/) (2025)
- [ObliInjection: Order-Oblivious Prompt Injection Attack to LLM Agents with Multi-source Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.09321/) (2025)
- [PROMPTFUZZ: Harnessing Fuzzing Techniques for Robust Testing of Prompt Injection in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.14729/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a new family of prompt injection attacks, termed Neural Exec. Unlike known attacks that rely on handcrafted strings (e.g., "Ignore previous instructions and..."), we show that it is possible to conceptualize the creation of execution triggers as a differentiable search problem and use learning-based methods to autonomously generate them. Our results demonstrate that a motivated adversary can forge triggers that are not only drastically more effective than current handcrafted ones but also exhibit inherent flexibility in shape, properties, and functionality. In this direction, we show that an attacker can design and generate Neural Execs capable of persisting through multi-stage preprocessing pipelines, such as in the case of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based applications. More critically, our findings show that attackers can produce triggers that deviate markedly in form and shape from any known attack, sidestepping existing blacklist-based detection and sanitation approaches.