# Multimodal Large Language Models to Support Real-World Fact-Checking

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03627 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03627/

## Key facts

- Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 22 of its 33 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2024.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/mllm-jailbreaks-and-adversarial-robustness/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03744/) (2023)
- [InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06500/) (2023)
- [MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13394/) (2023)
- [Video-LLaMA: An Instruction-tuned Audio-Visual Language Model for Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02858/) (2023)
- [FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14251/) (2023)
- [Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13063/) (2023)
- [Survey on Factuality in Large Language Models: Knowledge, Retrieval and Domain-Specificity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07521/) (2023)
- [Fact-Checking Complex Claims with Program-Guided Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12744/) (2023)
- [Automated Fact-Checking for Assisting Human Fact-Checkers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07769/) (2021)
- [Fighting Fake News: Image Splice Detection via Learned Self-Consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04096/) (2018)
- [How Many Unicorns Are in This Image? A Safety Evaluation Benchmark for Vision LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16101/) (2023)
- [NewsCLIPpings: Automatic Generation of Out-of-Context Multimodal Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05893/) (2021)
- [End-to-End Multimodal Fact-Checking and Explanation Generation: A Challenging Dataset and Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12487/) (2022)
- [SNIFFER: Multimodal Large Language Model for Explainable Out-of-Context Misinformation Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03170/) (2024)
- [Multimodal Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13507/) (2023)
- [Fact-Checking Meets Fauxtography: Verifying Claims About Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.11722/) (2019)
- [Do Large Language Models Know about Facts?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05177/) (2023)
- [GERE: Generative Evidence Retrieval for Fact Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05511/) (2022)
- [FactLLaMA: Optimizing Instruction-Following Language Models with External Knowledge for Automated Fact-Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00240/) (2023)
- [Read it Twice: Towards Faithfully Interpretable Fact Verification by Revisiting Evidence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03507/) (2023)
- [News Verifiers Showdown: A Comparative Performance Evaluation of ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4.0, Bing AI, and Bard in News Fact-Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17176/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [DEFAME: Dynamic Evidence-based FAct-checking with Multimodal Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.10510/) (2024)
- [Reference-free Hallucination Detection for Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.05767/) (2024)
- [An Empirical Analysis of Uncertainty in Large Language Model Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.10709/) (2025)
- [Can LLMs Improve Multimodal Fact-Checking by Asking Relevant Questions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04616/) (2024)
- [Hallucination to Truth: A Review of Fact-Checking and Factuality Evaluation in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03860/) (2025)
- [Piecing It All Together: Verifying Multi-Hop Multimodal Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.09547/) (2024)
- [Multimodal Fact-Checking with Vision Language Models: A Probing Classifier based Solution with Embedding Strategies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05155/) (2024)
- [XFacta: Contemporary, Real-World Dataset and Evaluation for Multimodal Misinformation Detection with Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.09999/) (2025)
- [M4FC: a Multimodal, Multilingual, Multicultural, Multitask Real-World Fact-Checking Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.23508/) (2025)
- [Drifting Away from Truth: GenAI-Driven News Diversity Challenges LVLM-Based Misinformation Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.12711/) (2025)
- [HintsOfTruth: A Multimodal Checkworthiness Detection Dataset with Real and Synthetic Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11753/) (2025)
- [Understanding Inequality of LLM Fact-Checking over Geographic Regions with Agent and Retrieval models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22877/) (2025)
- [Multilingual, Multimodal Pipeline for Creating Authentic and Structured Fact-Checked Claim Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.07985/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) carry the potential to support humans in processing vast amounts of information. While MLLMs are already being used as a fact-checking tool, their abilities and limitations in this regard are understudied. Here is aim to bridge this gap. In particular, we propose a framework for systematically assessing the capacity of current multimodal models to facilitate real-world fact-checking. Our methodology is evidence-free, leveraging only these models' intrinsic knowledge and reasoning capabilities. By designing prompts that extract models' predictions, explanations, and confidence levels, we delve into research questions concerning model accuracy, robustness, and reasons for failure. We empirically find that (1) GPT-4V exhibits superior performance in identifying malicious and misleading multimodal claims, with the ability to explain the unreasonable aspects and underlying motives, and (2) existing open-source models exhibit strong biases and are highly sensitive to the prompt. Our study offers insights into combating false multimodal information and building secure, trustworthy multimodal models. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to evaluate MLLMs for real-world fact-checking.