# Regeneration Based Training-free Attribution of Fake Images Generated by Text-to-Image Generative Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.01489 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.01489/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06125/) (2022)
- [BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13461/) (2019)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12092/) (2021)
- [GLIDE: Towards Photorealistic Image Generation and Editing with Text-Guided Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10741/) (2021)
- [Taming Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.09841/) (2020)
- [An Image is Worth One Word: Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation using Textual Inversion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.01618/) (2022)
- [LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02114/) (2021)
- [Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04870/) (2015)
- [ClipCap: CLIP Prefix for Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09734/) (2021)
- [Hard Prompts Made Easy: Gradient-Based Discrete Optimization for Prompt Tuning and Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.03668/) (2023)
- [DE-FAKE: Detection and Attribution of Fake Images Generated by Text-to-Image Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06998/) (2022)
- [Towards Discovery and Attribution of Open-world GAN Generated Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.04580/) (2021)
- [Prompt Stealing Attacks Against Text-to-Image Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09923/) (2023)
- [Prompting Hard or Hardly Prompting: Prompt Inversion for Text-to-Image Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.12416/) (2023)
- [RepMix: Representation Mixing for Robust Attribution of Synthesized Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.02063/) (2022)
- [Progressive Open Space Expansion for Open-Set Model Attribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.06877/) (2023)
- [Contrastive Pseudo Learning for Open-World DeepFake Attribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.11132/) (2023)
- [Model Attribution of Face-swap Deepfake Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12951/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [SPRINT: Robust Model Attribution of Generated Images via Secret Pixel Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05691/) (2025)
- [Protect-Your-IP: Scalable Source-Tracing and Attribution against Personalized Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16596/) (2024)
- [Stop My Dancing! Understanding, Detecting and Attributing Motion-Aware Deepfake Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.11496/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-image generative models have recently garnered significant attention due to their ability to generate images based on prompt descriptions. While these models have shown promising performance, concerns have been raised regarding the potential misuse of the generated fake images. In response to this, we have presented a simple yet effective training-free method to attribute fake images generated by text-to-image models to their source models. Given a test image to be attributed, we first inverse the textual prompt of the image, and then put the reconstructed prompt into different candidate models to regenerate candidate fake images. By calculating and ranking the similarity of the test image and the candidate images, we can determine the source of the image. This attribution allows model owners to be held accountable for any misuse of their models. Note that our approach does not limit the number of candidate text-to-image generative models. Comprehensive experiments reveal that (1) Our method can effectively attribute fake images to their source models, achieving comparable attribution performance with the state-of-the-art method; (2) Our method has high scalability ability, which is well adapted to real-world attribution scenarios. (3) The proposed method yields satisfactory robustness to common attacks, such as Gaussian blurring, JPEG compression, and Resizing. We also analyze the factors that influence the attribution performance, and explore the boost brought by the proposed method as a plug-in to improve the performance of existing SOTA. We hope our work can shed some light on the solutions to addressing the source of AI-generated images, as well as to prevent the misuse of text-to-image generative models.
