# Evaluating Large Language Models as Virtual Annotators for Time-series Physical Sensing Data

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.01133 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.01133/

## Key facts

- Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 30 of its 66 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 30)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05709/) (2020)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05722/) (2019)
- [Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09882/) (2020)
- [Video-LLaMA: An Instruction-tuned Audio-Visual Language Model for Video Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02858/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.00362/) (2020)
- [Self-Supervised Contrastive Pre-Training For Time Series via Time-Frequency Consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08496/) (2022)
- [A Survey of Human-in-the-loop for Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00941/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models are Few-Shot Health Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15525/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models for Time Series: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01801/) (2024)
- [Large-scale Training of Foundation Models for Wearable Biosignals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.05409/) (2023)
- [Exploring Contrastive Learning in Human Activity Recognition for Healthcare](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.11542/) (2020)
- [Self-supervised Learning for Human Activity Recognition Using 700,000 Person-days of Wearable Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.02909/) (2022)
- [Mobile Sensor Data Anonymization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.11546/) (2018)
- [Assessing the State of Self-Supervised Human Activity Recognition using Wearables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12938/) (2022)
- [Penetrative AI: Making LLMs Comprehend the Physical World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.09605/) (2023)
- [Time Series Change Point Detection with Self-Supervised Contrastive Predictive Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.14097/) (2020)
- [Leveraging Language Foundation Models for Human Mobility Forecasting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.05479/) (2022)
- [ELIXR: Towards a general purpose X-ray artificial intelligence system through alignment of large language models and radiology vision encoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01317/) (2023)
- [Multimodal LLMs for health grounded in individual-specific data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09018/) (2023)
- [What Makes Good Contrastive Learning on Small-Scale Wearable-based Tasks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05998/) (2022)
- [ColloSSL: Collaborative Self-Supervised Learning for Human Activity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.00758/) (2022)
- [COCOA: Cross Modality Contrastive Learning for Sensor Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.00467/) (2022)
- [REBAR: Retrieval-Based Reconstruction for Time-series Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.00519/) (2023)
- [Balancing Specialized and General Skills in LLMs: The Impact of Modern Tuning and Data Strategy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04945/) (2023)
- [Actively Avoiding Nonsense in Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.07229/) (2018)
- [From Classification to Clinical Insights: Towards Analyzing and Reasoning About Mobile and Behavioral Health Data With Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.13063/) (2023)
- [Accoustate: Auto-annotation of IMU-generated Activity Signatures under Smart Infrastructure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.06651/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [DrHouse: An LLM-empowered Diagnostic Reasoning System through Harnessing Outcomes from Sensor Data and Expert Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.12541/) (2024)
- [Past, Present, and Future of Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables: A Surveying Tutorial on a Still Challenging Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.14452/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Recognizers for Activities of Daily Living](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01238/) (2024)
- [SensorChat: Answering Qualitative and Quantitative Questions during Long-Term Multimodal Sensor Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02883/) (2025)
- [RAG-HAR: Retrieval Augmented Generation-based Human Activity Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.08984/) (2025)
- [EmbedGenius: Towards Automated Software Development for Generic Embedded IoT Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09058/) (2024)
- [FLUID-LLM: Learning Computational Fluid Dynamics with Spatiotemporal-aware Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04501/) (2024)
- [Foundation Models for CPS-IoT: Opportunities and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.16368/) (2025)
- [Leveraging Large Language Models for Explainable Activity Recognition in Smart Homes: A Critical Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16622/) (2025)
- [DailyLLM: Context-Aware Activity Log Generation Using Multi-Modal Sensors and LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.13737/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models Memorize Sensor Datasets! Implications on Human Activity Recognition Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.05900/) (2024)
- [AION: Next-Generation Tasks and Practical Harness for Time Series](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25045/) (2026)
- [RAG-HAR+: Towards Cost-Efficient LLM-Based Human Activity Recognition for Edge Deployment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.26631/) (2026)
- [Few-Shot Optimization for Sensor Data Using Large Language Models: A Case Study on Fatigue Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18754/) (2025)
- [Explaining Recovery Trajectories of Older Adults Post Lower-Limb Fracture Using Modality-wise Multiview Clustering and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12156/) (2025)
- [Enabling Near-realtime Remote Sensing via Satellite-Ground Collaboration of Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.24242/) (2025)
- [Who Does What? Archetypes of Roles Assigned to LLMs During Human-AI Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11924/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Traditional human-in-the-loop-based annotation for time-series data like inertial data often requires access to alternate modalities like video or audio from the environment. These alternate sources provide the necessary information to the human annotator, as the raw numeric data is often too obfuscated even for an expert. However, this traditional approach has many concerns surrounding overall cost, efficiency, storage of additional modalities, time, scalability, and privacy. Interestingly, recent large language models (LLMs) are also trained with vast amounts of publicly available alphanumeric data, which allows them to comprehend and perform well on tasks beyond natural language processing. Naturally, this opens up a potential avenue to explore LLMs as virtual annotators where the LLMs will be directly provided the raw sensor data for annotation instead of relying on any alternate modality. Naturally, this could mitigate the problems of the traditional human-in-the-loop approach. Motivated by this observation, we perform a detailed study in this paper to assess whether the state-of-the-art (SOTA) LLMs can be used as virtual annotators for labeling time-series physical sensing data. To perform this in a principled manner, we segregate the study into two major phases. In the first phase, we investigate the challenges an LLM like GPT-4 faces in comprehending raw sensor data. Considering the observations from phase 1, in the next phase, we investigate the possibility of encoding the raw sensor data using SOTA SSL approaches and utilizing the projected time-series data to get annotations from the LLM. Detailed evaluation with four benchmark HAR datasets shows that SSL-based encoding and metric-based guidance allow the LLM to make more reasonable decisions and provide accurate annotations without requiring computationally expensive fine-tuning or sophisticated prompt engineering.
