# Cognitive Bias in Decision-Making with LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00811 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00811/

## Key facts

- Cited by 106 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06520/) (2016)
- [Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckList](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04118/) (2020)
- [StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.09456/) (2020)
- [Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.05783/) (2021)
- [Self-Diagnosis and Self-Debiasing: A Proposal for Reducing Corpus-Based Bias in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00453/) (2021)
- [Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.13219/) (2021)
- [Pre-Trained Language Models for Interactive Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.01771/) (2022)
- [Large Pre-trained Language Models Contain Human-like Biases of What is Right and Wrong to Do](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.11790/) (2021)
- [Reducing Sentiment Bias in Language Models via Counterfactual Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03064/) (2019)
- [Bias Out-of-the-Box: An Empirical Analysis of Intersectional Occupational Biases in Popular Generative Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04130/) (2021)
- [50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.10104/) (2018)
- [Capturing Failures of Large Language Models via Human Cognitive Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12299/) (2022)
- [Prompted LLMs as Chatbot Modules for Long Open-domain Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04533/) (2023)
- [Instructed to Bias: Instruction-Tuned Language Models Exhibit Emergent Cognitive Bias](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00225/) (2023)
- [Supporting Human-AI Collaboration in Auditing LLMs with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.09991/) (2023)
- [Detect and Perturb: Neutral Rewriting of Biased and Sensitive Text via Gradient-based Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.11708/) (2021)
- [Challenging the appearance of machine intelligence: Cognitive bias in LLMs and Best Practices for Adoption](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01358/) (2023)
- [Despite "super-human" performance, current LLMs are unsuited for decisions about ethics and safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06295/) (2022)
- [Double Perturbation: On the Robustness of Robustness and Counterfactual Bias Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05232/) (2021)
- [Bias Beyond English: Counterfactual Tests for Bias in Sentiment Analysis in Four Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11673/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 106)

- [Introducing v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark from MLCommons](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12241/) (2024)
- [Anchoring Bias in Large Language Models: An Experimental Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.06593/) (2024)
- [Limitations of Large Language Models in Clinical Problem-Solving Arising from Inflexible Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04381/) (2025)
- [Large Language Model Reasoning Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06176/) (2026)
- [Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models: A Survey and Mitigation Experiments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.00323/) (2024)
- [Self-Correction Bench: Uncovering and Addressing the Self-Correction Blind Spot in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02778/) (2025)
- [Your AI, Not Your View: The Bias of LLMs in Investment Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.20957/) (2025)
- [Reasoning on a Spectrum: Aligning LLMs to System 1 and System 2 Thinking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12470/) (2025)
- [Persona-Assigned Large Language Models Exhibit Human-Like Motivated Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.20020/) (2025)
- [CBEval: A framework for evaluating and interpreting cognitive biases in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03605/) (2024)
- [Bias Beware: The Impact of Cognitive Biases on LLM-Driven Product Recommendations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01349/) (2025)
- [From the Fluency Fallacy to the Micro-to-Macro Validity Gap: Opportunities and Pitfalls of LLMs in Social Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.19364/) (2025)
- [The Bias is in the Details: An Assessment of Cognitive Bias in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22856/) (2025)
- [When Agents Say One Thing and Do Another: Validating Elicited Beliefs from LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06286/) (2026)
- [Persona Setting Pitfall: Persistent Outgroup Biases in Large Language Models Arising from Social Identity Adoption](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.03843/) (2024)
- [FairCoder: Probing LLM Bias in High-Stakes Decision Making via Coding Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05396/) (2025)
- [Training an LLM-as-a-Judge Model: Pipeline, Insights, and Practical Lessons](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.02988/) (2025)
- [Detecting and Filtering Unsafe Training Data via Data Attribution with Denoised Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11411/) (2025)
- [CoBRA: Programming Cognitive Bias in Social Agents Using Classic Social Science Experiments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13588/) (2025)
- [What Makes a Good Natural Language Prompt?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06950/) (2025)
- [Quantifying Cognitive Bias Induction in LLM-Generated Content](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.03194/) (2025)
- [How Does Cognitive Bias Affect Large Language Models? A Case Study on the Anchoring Effect in Price Negotiation Simulations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.21137/) (2025)
- [Comparing the Framing Effect in Humans and LLMs on Naturally Occurring Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17091/) (2025)
- [Do Emotions Really Affect Argument Convincingness? A Dynamic Approach with LLM-based Manipulation Checks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.00024/) (2025)
- [B-score: Detecting biases in large language models using response history](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18545/) (2025)
- [BiasFilter: An Inference-Time Debiasing Framework for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23829/) (2025)
- [Systematic Bias in Large Language Models: Discrepant Response Patterns in Binary vs. Continuous Judgment Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.19445/) (2025)
- [Fragile Preferences: A Deep Dive Into Order Effects in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.14092/) (2025)
- [Planted in Pretraining, Swayed by Finetuning: A Case Study on the Origins of Cognitive Biases in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.07186/) (2025)
- [Acquiescence Bias in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.08480/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) offer significant potential as tools to support an expanding range of decision-making tasks. Given their training on human (created) data, LLMs have been shown to inherit societal biases against protected groups, as well as be subject to bias functionally resembling cognitive bias. Human-like bias can impede fair and explainable decisions made with LLM assistance. Our work introduces BiasBuster, a framework designed to uncover, evaluate, and mitigate cognitive bias in LLMs, particularly in high-stakes decision-making tasks. Inspired by prior research in psychology and cognitive science, we develop a dataset containing 13,465 prompts to evaluate LLM decisions on different cognitive biases (e.g., prompt-induced, sequential, inherent). We test various bias mitigation strategies, while proposing a novel method utilizing LLMs to debias their own human-like cognitive bias within prompts. Our analysis provides a comprehensive picture of the presence and effects of cognitive bias across commercial and open-source models. We demonstrate that our selfhelp debiasing effectively mitigates model answers that display patterns akin to human cognitive bias without having to manually craft examples for each bias.
