# Towards Explaining Deep Neural Network Compression Through a Probabilistic Latent Space

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00155 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00155/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Feb 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02626/) (2015)
- [Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.08710/) (2016)
- [Channel Pruning for Accelerating Very Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06168/) (2017)
- [To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.01878/) (2017)
- [What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.03033/) (2020)
- [Learning Structured Sparsity in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.03665/) (2016)
- [Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.10771/) (2019)
- [ThiNet: A Filter Level Pruning Method for Deep Neural Network Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06342/) (2017)
- [Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.07683/) (2020)
- [Structured Pruning of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.08571/) (2015)
- [Group Fisher Pruning for Practical Network Compression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00708/) (2021)
- [Gate Decorator: Global Filter Pruning Method for Accelerating Deep Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.08174/) (2019)
- [Rethinking the Smaller-Norm-Less-Informative Assumption in Channel Pruning of Convolution Layers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.00124/) (2018)
- [A Signal Propagation Perspective for Pruning Neural Networks at Initialization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.06307/) (2019)
- [Pruning by Explaining: A Novel Criterion for Deep Neural Network Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.08881/) (2019)
- [Centripetal SGD for Pruning Very Deep Convolutional Networks with Complicated Structure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.03837/) (2019)
- [Lookahead: A Far-Sighted Alternative of Magnitude-based Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.04809/) (2020)
- [MINT: Deep Network Compression via Mutual Information-based Neuron Trimming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08472/) (2020)
- [Theoretical Understanding of the Information Flow on Continual Learning Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.12010/) (2022)
- [Slimming Neural Networks using Adaptive Connectivity Scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.12463/) (2020)
- [Projected BNNs: Avoiding weight-space pathologies by learning latent representations of neural network weights](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.07006/) (2018)
- [Lower Bounds for the Total Variation Distance Given Means and Variances of Distributions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.05820/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Symbolic--KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks with Discrete Symbolic Structure for Interpretable Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.23854/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the impressive performance of deep neural networks (DNNs), their computational complexity and storage space consumption have led to the concept of network compression. While DNN compression techniques such as pruning and low-rank decomposition have been extensively studied, there has been insufficient attention paid to their theoretical explanation. In this paper, we propose a novel theoretical framework that leverages a probabilistic latent space of DNN weights and explains the optimal network sparsity by using the information-theoretic divergence measures. We introduce new analogous projected patterns (AP2) and analogous-in-probability projected patterns (AP3) notions for DNNs and prove that there exists a relationship between AP3/AP2 property of layers in the network and its performance. Further, we provide a theoretical analysis that explains the training process of the compressed network. The theoretical results are empirically validated through experiments conducted on standard pre-trained benchmarks, including AlexNet, ResNet50, and VGG16, using CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 datasets. Through our experiments, we highlight the relationship of AP3 and AP2 properties with fine-tuning pruned DNNs and sparsity levels.
