# Implications of Regulations on the Use of AI and Generative AI for Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00148 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.00148/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 29 Feb 2024.

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Surveys Considered Harmful? Reflecting on the Use of Surveys in AI Research, Development, and Governance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.01458/) (2024)
- [Carbon-Aware Governance Gates: An Architecture for Sustainable GenAI Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.19718/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

With the upcoming AI regulations (e.g., EU AI Act) and rapid advancements in generative AI, new challenges emerge in the area of Human-Centered Responsible Artificial Intelligence (HCR-AI). As AI becomes more ubiquitous, questions around decision-making authority, human oversight, accountability, sustainability, and the ethical and legal responsibilities of AI and their creators become paramount. Addressing these questions requires a collaborative approach. By involving stakeholders from various disciplines in the 2textsuperscriptnd edition of the HCR-AI Special Interest Group (SIG) at CHI 2024, we aim to discuss the implications of regulations in HCI research, develop new theories, evaluation frameworks, and methods to navigate the complex nature of AI ethics, steering AI development in a direction that is beneficial and sustainable for all of humanity.
