# Successfully Guiding Humans with Imperfect Instructions by Highlighting Potential Errors and Suggesting Corrections

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16973 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16973/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 55 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 Feb 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.07280/) (2017)
- [Object Hallucination in Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02156/) (2018)
- [Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.12840/) (2019)
- [Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04319/) (2019)
- [Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18654/) (2023)
- [Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14779/) (2020)
- [Speaker-Follower Models for Vision-and-Language Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.02724/) (2018)
- [FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03754/) (2020)
- [Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.02114/) (2020)
- [Reasoning or Reciting? Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Language Models Through Counterfactual Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02477/) (2023)
- [Challenges in Data-to-Document Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.08052/) (2017)
- [Improving Vision-and-Language Navigation with Image-Text Pairs from the Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14973/) (2020)
- [Detecting Hallucinated Content in Conditional Neural Sequence Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.02593/) (2020)
- [A Token-level Reference-free Hallucination Detection Benchmark for Free-form Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08704/) (2021)
- [Airbert: In-domain Pretraining for Vision-and-Language Navigation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.09105/) (2021)
- [On Exposure Bias, Hallucination and Domain Shift in Neural Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03642/) (2020)
- [Towards a Science of Human-AI Decision Making: A Survey of Empirical Studies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.11471/) (2021)
- [Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization with Contrast Candidate Generation and Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09061/) (2021)
- [Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Machine Translation: Model Internal Workings Alone Do Well, Sentence Similarity Even Better](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08597/) (2022)
- [Who Should I Trust: AI or Myself? Leveraging Human and AI Correctness Likelihood to Promote Appropriate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.05809/) (2023)
- [Domain Robustness in Neural Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03109/) (2019)
- [Less is More: Generating Grounded Navigation Instructions from Landmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.12872/) (2021)
- [A New Path: Scaling Vision-and-Language Navigation with Synthetic Instructions and Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03112/) (2022)
- [Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.07938/) (2020)
- [Unified Pragmatic Models for Generating and Following Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.04987/) (2017)
- [Understanding and Detecting Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translation via Model Introspection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07779/) (2023)
- [Controlling Hallucinations at Word Level in Data-to-Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02810/) (2021)
- [Human-Aligned Calibration for AI-Assisted Decision Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00074/) (2023)
- [Define, Evaluate, and Improve Task-Oriented Cognitive Capabilities for Instruction Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.05149/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Translation in the Hands of Many:Centering Lay Users in Machine Translation Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13780/) (2025)
- [Can Hallucination Correction Improve Video-Language Alignment?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15079/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Language models will inevitably err in situations with which they are unfamiliar. However, by effectively communicating uncertainties, they can still guide humans toward making sound decisions in those contexts. We demonstrate this idea by developing HEAR, a system that can successfully guide humans in simulated residential environments despite generating potentially inaccurate instructions. Diverging from systems that provide users with only the instructions they generate, HEAR warns users of potential errors in its instructions and suggests corrections. This rich uncertainty information effectively prevents misguidance and reduces the search space for users. Evaluation with 80 users shows that HEAR achieves a 13% increase in success rate and a 29% reduction in final location error distance compared to only presenting instructions to users. Interestingly, we find that offering users possibilities to explore, HEAR motivates them to make more attempts at the task, ultimately leading to a higher success rate. To our best knowledge, this work is the first to show the practical benefits of uncertainty communication in a long-horizon sequential decision-making problem.
