# Uniformly Safe RL with Objective Suppression for Multi-Constraint Safety-Critical Applications

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15650 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.15650/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Safe and constrained RL, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 22 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2024.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [Safe and constrained RL](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/safe-and-constrained-rl/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.5602/) (2013)
- [CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulator](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.03938/) (2017)
- [Concrete Problems in AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.06565/) (2016)
- [Constrained Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.10528/) (2017)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.00444/) (2020)
- [Reward Constrained Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.11074/) (2018)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Manipulation with Asynchronous Off-Policy Updates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.00633/) (2016)
- [Risk-Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Percentile Risk Criteria](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.01629/) (2015)
- [Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.03964/) (2020)
- [Safe, Multi-Agent, Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.03295/) (2016)
- [End-to-End Safe Reinforcement Learning through Barrier Functions for Safety-Critical Continuous Control Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.08792/) (2019)
- [Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.08757/) (2018)
- [A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning: Methods, Theory and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10330/) (2022)
- [Recovery RL: Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Recovery Zones](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.15920/) (2020)
- [Waymax: An Accelerated, Data-Driven Simulator for Large-Scale Autonomous Driving Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08710/) (2023)
- [Imitation Is Not Enough: Robustifying Imitation with Reinforcement Learning for Challenging Driving Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.11419/) (2022)
- [Conservative Safety Critics for Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.14497/) (2020)
- [ReasonNet: End-to-End Driving with Temporal and Global Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10507/) (2023)
- [OptLayer - Practical Constrained Optimization for Deep Reinforcement Learning in the Real World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.07643/) (2017)
- [State-wise Safe Reinforcement Learning: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.03122/) (2023)
- [Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning with a Safety Editor Policy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12427/) (2022)
- [Continuously Discovering Novel Strategies via Reward-Switching Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02246/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [A Review of Safe Reinforcement Learning Methods for Modern Power Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.00304/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Safe reinforcement learning tasks are a challenging domain despite being very common in the real world. The widely adopted CMDP model constrains the risks in expectation, which makes room for dangerous behaviors in long-tail states. In safety-critical domains, such behaviors could lead to disastrous outcomes. To address this issue, we first describe the problem with a stronger Uniformly Constrained MDP (UCMDP) model where we impose constraints on all reachable states; we then propose Objective Suppression, a novel method that adaptively suppresses the task reward maximizing objectives according to a safety critic, as a solution to the Lagrangian dual of a UCMDP. We benchmark Objective Suppression in two multi-constraint safety domains, including an autonomous driving domain where any incorrect behavior can lead to disastrous consequences. On the driving domain, we evaluate on open source and proprietary data and evaluate transfer to a real autonomous fleet. Empirically, we demonstrate that our proposed method, when combined with existing safe RL algorithms, can match the task reward achieved by baselines with significantly fewer constraint violations.