# Social Convos: Capturing Agendas and Emotions on Social Media

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15571 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.15571/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.03426/) (2018)
- [PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.08777/) (2019)
- [A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04023/) (2023)
- [BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05794/) (2022)
- [Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13848/) (2023)
- [TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12421/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of ChatGPT for Query or Aspect-based Text Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08081/) (2023)
- [EmotionX-IDEA: Emotion BERT -- an Affectional Model for Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.06264/) (2019)
- [Natural Language Inference Prompts for Zero-shot Emotion Classification in Text across Corpora](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06701/) (2022)
- [Characterizing the 2016 Russian IRA Influence Campaign](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.01997/) (2018)
- [Measuring user influence on Twitter: A survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.07951/) (2015)
- [The role of bot squads in the political propaganda on Twitter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12687/) (2019)
- [From Stance to Concern: Adaptation of Propositional Analysis to New Tasks and Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10659/) (2022)
- [Towards Detecting Harmful Agendas in News Articles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00102/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Social media platforms are popular tools for disseminating targeted information during major public events like elections or pandemics. Systematic analysis of the message traffic can provide valuable insights into prevailing opinions and social dynamics among different segments of the population. We are specifically interested in influence spread, and in particular whether more deliberate influence operations can be detected. However, filtering out the essential messages with telltale influence indicators from the extensive and often chaotic social media traffic is a major challenge. In this paper we present a novel approach to extract influence indicators from messages circulating among groups of users discussing particular topics. We build upon the concept of a convo to identify influential authors who are actively promoting some particular agenda around that topic within the group. We focus on two influence indicators: the (control of) agenda and the use of emotional language.