# SoK: Analyzing Adversarial Examples: A Framework to Study Adversary Knowledge

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14937 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14937/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 74 of its 116 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 74)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Densely Connected Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.06993/) (2016)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.00567/) (2015)
- [Intriguing properties of neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6199/) (2013)
- [Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.12877/) (2020)
- [Wide Residual Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.07146/) (2016)
- [Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.04644/) (2016)
- [Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.02918/) (2019)
- [Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07204/) (2017)
- [Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.03994/) (2020)
- [RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.09670/) (2020)
- [Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.11569/) (2020)
- [Diffusion Models for Adversarial Purification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.07460/) (2022)
- [Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.09960/) (2019)
- [Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13213/) (2023)
- [Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.08489/) (2020)
- [Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03593/) (2020)
- [Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.01946/) (2021)
- [Adversarial Example Does Good: Preventing Painting Imitation from Diffusion Models via Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04578/) (2023)
- [Admix: Enhancing the Transferability of Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.00436/) (2021)
- [Frequency Domain Model Augmentation for Adversarial Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05382/) (2022)
- [Shadows can be Dangerous: Stealthy and Effective Physical-world Adversarial Attack by Natural Phenomenon](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.03818/) (2022)
- [Defense Against Adversarial Attacks Using Feature Scattering-based Adversarial Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10764/) (2019)
- [Diffusion Models for Imperceptible and Transferable Adversarial Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08192/) (2023)
- [Learnable Boundary Guided Adversarial Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.11164/) (2020)
- [Frequency-driven Imperceptible Adversarial Attack on Semantic Similarity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05151/) (2022)
- [Boosting the Transferability of Adversarial Attacks with Reverse Adversarial Perturbation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.05968/) (2022)
- [Robust Evaluation of Diffusion-Based Adversarial Purification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09051/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [SoK: Colluding Adversaries in Machine Learning Pipelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.10091/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial examples are malicious inputs to machine learning models that trigger a misclassification. This type of attack has been studied for close to a decade, and we find that there is a lack of study and formalization of adversary knowledge when mounting attacks. This has yielded a complex space of attack research with hard-to-compare threat models and attacks. We focus on the image classification domain and provide a theoretical framework to study adversary knowledge inspired by work in order theory. We present an adversarial example game, inspired by cryptographic games, to standardize attacks. We survey recent attacks in the image classification domain and classify their adversary's knowledge in our framework. From this systematization, we compile results that both confirm existing beliefs about adversary knowledge, such as the potency of information about the attacked model as well as allow us to derive new conclusions on the difficulty associated with the white-box and transferable threat models, for example, that transferable attacks might not be as difficult as previously thought.
