# R3: "This is My SQL, Are You With Me?" A Consensus-Based Multi-Agent System for Text-to-SQL Tasks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14851 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14851/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 14 of its 24 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00352/) (2023)
- [Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08887/) (2018)
- [Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.12588/) (2022)
- [Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09687/) (2023)
- [Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03111/) (2023)
- [DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11015/) (2023)
- [Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.15363/) (2023)
- [C3: Zero-shot Text-to-SQL with ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.07306/) (2023)
- [Language Agents with Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Play in the Werewolf Game](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18940/) (2023)
- [Recent Advances in Text-to-SQL: A Survey of What We Have and What We Expect](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.10099/) (2022)
- [You Are What You Annotate: Towards Better Models through Annotator Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14663/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Next-Generation Database Interfaces: A Survey of LLM-based Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08426/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Employing Large Language Models for Text-to-SQL Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15186/) (2024)
- [SHARE: An SLM-based Hierarchical Action CorREction Assistant for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00391/) (2025)
- [Exploring the Landscape of Text-to-SQL with Large Language Models: Progresses, Challenges and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23838/) (2025)
- [Pi-SQL: Enhancing Text-to-SQL with Fine-Grained Guidance from Pivot Programming Languages](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00912/) (2025)
- [Distill-C: Enhanced NL2SQL via Distilled Customization with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00048/) (2025)
- [Beyond Static Rules: Automated Discovery of Latent Vulnerabilities in Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.03833/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on various tasks. To unleash their power on the Text-to-SQL task, we propose R3 (Review-Rebuttal-Revision), a consensus-based multi-agent system for Text-to-SQL tasks. R3 outperforms the existing single LLM Text-to-SQL systems as well as the multi-agent Text-to-SQL systems by 1.3% to 8.1% on Spider and Bird. Surprisingly, we find that for Llama-3-8B, R3 outperforms chain-of-thought prompting by over 20%, even outperforming GPT-3.5 on the development set of Spider.