# BIRCO: A Benchmark of Information Retrieval Tasks with Complex Objectives

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14151 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14151/

## Key facts

- Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 36 of its 58 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 36)

- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07830/) (2019)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.03426/) (2018)
- [SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08821/) (2021)
- [Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09261/) (2022)
- [MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.09268/) (2016)
- [FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.05355/) (2018)
- [Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.03533/) (2022)
- [BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08663/) (2021)
- [Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.07207/) (2022)
- [DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.00161/) (2019)
- [Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14974/) (2020)
- [Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10496/) (2022)
- [ColBERTv2: Effective and Efficient Retrieval via Lightweight Late Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.01488/) (2021)
- [Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.06713/) (2020)
- [Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.09542/) (2023)
- [One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09741/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.17563/) (2023)
- [Fine-Tuning LLaMA for Multi-Stage Text Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.08319/) (2023)
- [Promptagator: Few-shot Dense Retrieval From 8 Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11755/) (2022)
- [CLIMATE-FEVER: A Dataset for Verification of Real-World Climate Claims](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.00614/) (2020)
- [Improving Passage Retrieval with Zero-Shot Question Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.07496/) (2022)
- [DiffCSE: Difference-based Contrastive Learning for Sentence Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.10298/) (2022)
- [SciRepEval: A Multi-Format Benchmark for Scientific Document Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.13308/) (2022)
- [SPLADE v2: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for Information Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.10086/) (2021)
- [Task-aware Retrieval with Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09260/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [BRIGHT: A Realistic and Challenging Benchmark for Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12883/) (2024)
- [ReasonIR: Training Retrievers for Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.20595/) (2025)
- [τ-Knowledge: Evaluating Conversational Agents over Unstructured Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.04370/) (2026)
- [A Reasoning-Focused Legal Retrieval Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03970/) (2025)
- [LLMs are Also Effective Embedding Models: An In-depth Overview](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.12591/) (2024)
- [Drowning in Documents: Consequences of Scaling Reranker Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.11767/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking Information Retrieval Models on Complex Retrieval Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.07253/) (2025)
- [Balancing the Blend: An Experimental Analysis of Trade-offs in Hybrid Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.01405/) (2025)
- [Prompts as Auto-Optimized Training Hyperparameters: Training Best-in-Class IR Models from Scratch with 10 Gold Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11706/) (2024)
- [Revisiting RAG Retrievers: An Information Theoretic Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.21553/) (2026)
- [SparseCL: Sparse Contrastive Learning for Contradiction Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10746/) (2024)
- [CT Open: An Open-Access, Uncontaminated, Live Platform for the Open Challenge of Clinical Trial Outcome Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.16742/) (2026)
- [ImpliRet: Benchmarking the Implicit Fact Retrieval Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.14407/) (2025)
- [HAKARI-Bench: A Lightweight Benchmark for Comparing Retrieval Architectures and Efficiency Settings under Unified Conditions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.22778/) (2026)
- [Healthier LLMs: Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Public Health Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.06641/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We present the Benchmark of Information Retrieval (IR) tasks with Complex Objectives (BIRCO). BIRCO evaluates the ability of IR systems to retrieve documents given multi-faceted user objectives. The benchmark's complexity and compact size make it suitable for evaluating large language model (LLM)-based information retrieval systems. We present a modular framework for investigating factors that may influence LLM performance on retrieval tasks, and identify a simple baseline model which matches or outperforms existing approaches and more complex alternatives. No approach achieves satisfactory performance on all benchmark tasks, suggesting that stronger models and new retrieval protocols are necessary to address complex user needs.