# Confidence Matters: Revisiting Intrinsic Self-Correction Capabilities of Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12563 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12563/

## Key facts

- Cited by 47 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 45 of its 60 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 45)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04615/) (2022)
- [Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Know](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05221/) (2022)
- [Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14325/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01798/) (2023)
- [Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debug](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05128/) (2023)
- [Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07191/) (2021)
- [CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11738/) (2023)
- [Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14375/) (2022)
- [Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01693/) (2023)
- [Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12295/) (2023)
- [Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.05802/) (2022)
- [Language Models can Solve Computer Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17491/) (2023)
- [Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12813/) (2023)
- [RARR: Researching and Revising What Language Models Say, Using Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08726/) (2022)
- [Generating Sequences by Learning to Self-Correct](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00053/) (2022)
- [FacTool: Factuality Detection in Generative AI -- A Tool Augmented Framework for Multi-Task and Multi-Domain Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13528/) (2023)
- [LLM Self Defense: By Self Examination, LLMs Know They Are Being Tricked](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07308/) (2023)
- [Improving Language Model Negotiation with Self-Play and In-Context Learning from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10142/) (2023)
- [REFINER: Reasoning Feedback on Intermediate Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01904/) (2023)
- [Is Self-Repair a Silver Bullet for Code Generation?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09896/) (2023)
- [Re3: Generating Longer Stories With Recursive Reprompting and Revision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06774/) (2022)
- [The Capacity for Moral Self-Correction in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.07459/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 47)

- [When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01297/) (2024)
- [The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.02547/) (2025)
- [A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: What, When, How, and Where to Evolve on the Path to Artificial Super Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.21046/) (2025)
- [On Verbalized Confidence Scores for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14737/) (2024)
- [Lifelong Learning of Large Language Model based Agents: A Roadmap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.07278/) (2025)
- [Latent Space Chain-of-Embedding Enables Output-free LLM Self-Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13640/) (2024)
- [A Theoretical Understanding of Self-Correction through In-context Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.18634/) (2024)
- [Self-Correction is More than Refinement: A Learning Framework for Visual and Language Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04055/) (2024)
- [Causality for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15319/) (2024)
- [Low-probability Tokens Sustain Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.03222/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning from Multi-role Debates as Feedback for Bias Mitigation in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.10160/) (2024)
- [Can Large Vision-Language Models Correct Semantic Grounding Errors By Themselves?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06510/) (2024)
- [On the Intrinsic Self-Correction Capability of LLMs: Uncertainty and Latent Concept](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02378/) (2024)
- [Generative AI Act II: Test Time Scaling Drives Cognition Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13828/) (2025)
- [Not All Queries Need Deep Thought: CoFiCot for Adaptive Coarse-to-fine Stateful Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08251/) (2026)
- [Meta-Thinking in LLMs via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14520/) (2025)
- [A Closer Look at Logical Reasoning with LLMs: The Choice of Tool Matters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00284/) (2024)
- [Beyond Pipelines: A Survey of the Paradigm Shift toward Model-Native Agentic AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.16720/) (2025)
- [Revision or Re-Solving? Decomposing Second-Pass Gains in Multi-LLM Pipelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.01029/) (2026)
- [FIRE: A Dataset for Feedback Integration and Refinement Evaluation of Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.11522/) (2024)
- [Re-Thinking Process Mining in the AI-Based Agents Era](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.07720/) (2024)
- [Entropy-Based Adaptive Weighting for Self-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23913/) (2025)
- [Can LLMs Detect Their Confabulations? Estimating Reliability in Uncertainty-Aware Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.08139/) (2025)
- [Self-Improvement of Large Language Models: A Technical Overview and Future Outlook](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.25681/) (2026)
- [Towards Self-Refinement of Vision-Language Models with Triangular Consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10487/) (2025)
- [Self-Debias: Self-correcting for Debiasing Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08243/) (2026)
- [How LLMs Detect and Correct Their Own Errors: The Role of Internal Confidence Signals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.22271/) (2026)
- [Automating Intervention Discovery from Scientific Literature: A Progressive Ontology Prompting and Dual-LLM Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.00054/) (2024)
- [Explaining Intrinsic Moral Self-Correction with Mechanistic Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.11924/) (2025)
- [Adaptive and Resource-efficient Agentic AI Systems for Mobile and Embedded Devices: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00078/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The recent success of Large Language Models (LLMs) has catalyzed an increasing interest in their self-correction capabilities. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the intrinsic self-correction of LLMs, attempting to address the ongoing debate about its feasibility. Our research has identified an important latent factor - the "confidence" of LLMs - during the self-correction process. Overlooking this factor may cause the models to over-criticize themselves, resulting in unreliable conclusions regarding the efficacy of self-correction. We have experimentally observed that LLMs possess the capability to understand the "confidence" in their own responses. It motivates us to develop an "If-or-Else" (IoE) prompting framework, designed to guide LLMs in assessing their own "confidence", facilitating intrinsic self-corrections. We conduct extensive experiments and demonstrate that our IoE-based Prompt can achieve a consistent improvement regarding the accuracy of self-corrected responses over the initial answers. Our study not only sheds light on the underlying factors affecting self-correction in LLMs, but also introduces a practical framework that utilizes the IoE prompting principle to efficiently improve self-correction capabilities with "confidence". The code is available at https://github.com/MBZUAI-CLeaR/IoE-Prompting.git.