# A Multi-Aspect Framework for Counter Narrative Evaluation using Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11676 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11676/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16634/) (2023)
- [A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.03055/) (2015)
- [Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehend](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03340/) (2015)
- [Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01937/) (2023)
- [BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11520/) (2021)
- [Is ChatGPT a Good NLG Evaluator? A Preliminary Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04048/) (2023)
- [A Benchmark Dataset for Learning to Intervene in Online Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.04251/) (2019)
- [CONAN -- COunter NArratives through Nichesourcing: a Multilingual Dataset of Responses to Fight Online Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03270/) (2019)
- [Human-in-the-Loop for Data Collection: a Multi-Target Counter Narrative Dataset to Fight Online Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.08720/) (2021)
- [Generate, Prune, Select: A Pipeline for Counterspeech Generation against Online Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01625/) (2021)
- [Towards Knowledge-Grounded Counter Narrative Generation for Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11783/) (2021)
- [Human-Machine Collaboration Approaches to Build a Dialogue Dataset for Hate Speech Countering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.03433/) (2022)
- [Using Pre-Trained Language Models for Producing Counter Narratives Against Hate Speech: a Comparative Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.01440/) (2022)
- [GPT-4 as an Effective Zero-Shot Evaluator for Scientific Figure Captions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15405/) (2023)
- [ReZG: Retrieval-Augmented Zero-Shot Counter Narrative Generation for Hate Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.05650/) (2023)
- [A Framework for Automated Measurement of Responsible AI Harms in Generative AI Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17750/) (2023)
- [Weigh Your Own Words: Improving Hate Speech Counter Narrative Generation via Attention Regularization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.02311/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Evaluating LLM-based Agents for Multi-Turn Conversations: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22458/) (2025)
- [Uncertainty Quantification for Language Models: A Suite of Black-Box, White-Box, LLM Judge, and Ensemble Scorers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.19254/) (2025)
- [Effectiveness of Counter-Speech against Abusive Content: A Multidimensional Annotation and Classification Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.11919/) (2025)
- [When in Doubt, Cascade: Towards Building Efficient and Capable Guardrails](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06323/) (2024)
- [CAIRe: Cultural Attribution of Images by Retrieval-Augmented Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09109/) (2025)
- [Counter with Evidence! A Multi-Agent Memory Efficient Reasoning Framework for Hate Category Informed Counterspeech Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.23152/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Counter narratives - informed responses to hate speech contexts designed to refute hateful claims and de-escalate encounters - have emerged as an effective hate speech intervention strategy. While previous work has proposed automatic counter narrative generation methods to aid manual interventions, the evaluation of these approaches remains underdeveloped. Previous automatic metrics for counter narrative evaluation lack alignment with human judgment as they rely on superficial reference comparisons instead of incorporating key aspects of counter narrative quality as evaluation criteria. To address prior evaluation limitations, we propose a novel evaluation framework prompting LLMs to provide scores and feedback for generated counter narrative candidates using 5 defined aspects derived from guidelines from counter narrative specialized NGOs. We found that LLM evaluators achieve strong alignment to human-annotated scores and feedback and outperform alternative metrics, indicating their potential as multi-aspect, reference-free and interpretable evaluators for counter narrative evaluation.