# A Spectrum Evaluation Benchmark for Medical Multi-Modal Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11217 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11217/

## Key facts

- Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Medical vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 17 of its 56 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Feb 2024.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Medical vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/medical-vision-language-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparison](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.07031/) (2019)
- [LLaVA-Med: Training a Large Language-and-Vision Assistant for Biomedicine in One Day](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00890/) (2023)
- [MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14795/) (2021)
- [SLAKE: A Semantically-Labeled Knowledge-Enhanced Dataset for Medical Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09542/) (2021)
- [Med-Flamingo: a Multimodal Medical Few-shot Learner](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.15189/) (2023)
- [Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.08242/) (2022)
- [PMC-CLIP: Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training using Biomedical Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.07240/) (2023)
- [BiomedGPT: A Generalist Vision-Language Foundation Model for Diverse Biomedical Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17100/) (2023)
- [OmniMedVQA: A New Large-Scale Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Medical LVLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09181/) (2024)
- [Towards Generalist Foundation Model for Radiology by Leveraging Web-scale 2D&3D Medical Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02463/) (2023)
- [A Vision-Language Foundation Model to Enhance Efficiency of Chest X-ray Interpretation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12208/) (2024)
- [Can GPT-4V(ision) Serve Medical Applications? Case Studies on GPT-4V for Multimodal Medical Diagnosis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.09909/) (2023)
- [MedICaT: A Dataset of Medical Images, Captions, and Textual References](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.06000/) (2020)
- [Multimodal LLMs for health grounded in individual-specific data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09018/) (2023)
- [Long-Tailed Classification of Thorax Diseases on Chest X-Ray: A New Benchmark Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.13365/) (2022)
- [A Systematic Evaluation of GPT-4V's Multimodal Capability for Medical Image Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.20381/) (2023)
- [The HAM10000 dataset, a large collection of multi-source dermatoscopic images of common pigmented skin lesions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.10417/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [A Survey on Benchmarks of Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08632/) (2024)
- [CARES: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Trustworthiness in Medical Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06007/) (2024)
- [MMAD: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models in Industrial Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.09453/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Evaluation of Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15769/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Scientific Large Language Models: From Data Foundations to Agent Frontiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.21148/) (2025)
- [A Survey on Multimodal Benchmarks: In the Era of Large AI Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18142/) (2024)
- [MediConfusion: Can you trust your AI radiologist? Probing the reliability of multimodal medical foundation models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.15477/) (2024)
- [Medchain: Bridging the Gap Between LLM Agents and Clinical Practice with Interactive Sequence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.01605/) (2024)
- [EndoBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Multi-Modal Large Language Models for Endoscopy Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23601/) (2025)
- [Aligning the Objective of LLM-based Program Repair](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08877/) (2024)
- [MME-Finance: A Multimodal Finance Benchmark for Expert-level Understanding and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.03314/) (2024)
- [MTBBench: A Multimodal Sequential Clinical Decision-Making Benchmark in Oncology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.20490/) (2025)
- [VCRBench: Exploring Long-form Causal Reasoning Capabilities of Large Video Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08455/) (2025)
- [CBVLM: Training-free Explainable Concept-based Large Vision Language Models for Medical Image Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12266/) (2025)
- [EHRBench: An Automated and Reliable EHR-based Benchmark for Clinical Decision Making with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.30637/) (2026)
- [MedBLINK: Probing Basic Perception in Multimodal Language Models for Medicine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02951/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The significant breakthroughs of Medical Multi-Modal Large Language Models (Med-MLLMs) renovate modern healthcare with robust information synthesis and medical decision support. However, these models are often evaluated on benchmarks that are unsuitable for the Med-MLLMs due to the complexity of real-world diagnostics across diverse specialties. To address this gap, we introduce Asclepius, a novel Med-MLLM benchmark that comprehensively assesses Med-MLLMs in terms of: distinct medical specialties (cardiovascular, gastroenterology, etc.) and different diagnostic capacities (perception, disease analysis, etc.). Grounded in 3 proposed core principles, Asclepius ensures a comprehensive evaluation by encompassing 15 medical specialties, stratifying into 3 main categories and 8 sub-categories of clinical tasks, and exempting overlap with existing VQA dataset. We further provide an in-depth analysis of 6 Med-MLLMs and compare them with 3 human specialists, providing insights into their competencies and limitations in various medical contexts. Our work not only advances the understanding of Med-MLLMs' capabilities but also sets a precedent for future evaluations and the safe deployment of these models in clinical environments.