# An Analysis of Language Frequency and Error Correction for Esperanto

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.09696 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09696/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.13461/) (2019)
- [Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02116/) (2019)
- [CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.00359/) (2019)
- [Word Translation Without Parallel Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.04087/) (2017)
- [GECToR -- Grammatical Error Correction: Tag, Not Rewrite](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.12592/) (2020)
- [Towards a Cleaner Document-Oriented Multilingual Crawled Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.06642/) (2022)
- [Grammatical Error Correction: A Survey of the State of the Art](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05166/) (2022)
- [MuCGEC: a Multi-Reference Multi-Source Evaluation Dataset for Chinese Grammatical Error Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.10994/) (2022)
- [GrammarGPT: Exploring Open-Source LLMs for Native Chinese Grammatical Error Correction with Supervised Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13923/) (2023)
- [GEE! Grammar Error Explanation with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09517/) (2023)
- [NaSGEC: a Multi-Domain Chinese Grammatical Error Correction Dataset from Native Speaker Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16023/) (2023)
- [Using Multiple Subwords to Improve English-Esperanto Automated Literary Translation Quality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.14190/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Current Grammar Error Correction (GEC) initiatives tend to focus on major languages, with less attention given to low-resource languages like Esperanto. In this article, we begin to bridge this gap by first conducting a comprehensive frequency analysis using the Eo-GP dataset, created explicitly for this purpose. We then introduce the Eo-GEC dataset, derived from authentic user cases and annotated with fine-grained linguistic details for error identification. Leveraging GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, our experiments show that GPT-4 outperforms GPT-3.5 in both automated and human evaluations, highlighting its efficacy in addressing Esperanto's grammatical peculiarities and illustrating the potential of advanced language models to enhance GEC strategies for less commonly studied languages.