# Improving Generalization in Semantic Parsing by Increasing Natural Language Variation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.08666 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08666/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10683/) (2019)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.01068/) (2022)
- [SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08821/) (2021)
- [Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08887/) (2018)
- [Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03111/) (2023)
- [Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.00103/) (2017)
- [PICARD: Parsing Incrementally for Constrained Auto-Regressive Decoding from Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05093/) (2021)
- [RESDSQL: Decoupling Schema Linking and Skeleton Parsing for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05965/) (2023)
- [AnnoLLM: Making Large Language Models to Be Better Crowdsourced Annotators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16854/) (2023)
- [Compositional Generalization and Natural Language Variation: Can a Semantic Parsing Approach Handle Both?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12725/) (2020)
- [Improving Text-to-SQL Evaluation Methodology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.09029/) (2018)
- [Semantic Evaluation for Text-to-SQL with Distilled Test Suites](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02840/) (2020)
- [Structure-Grounded Pretraining for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12773/) (2020)
- [A comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT's zero-shot Text-to-SQL capability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13547/) (2023)
- [Towards Robustness of Text-to-SQL Models against Synonym Substitution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01065/) (2021)
- [KaggleDBQA: Realistic Evaluation of Text-to-SQL Parsers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.11455/) (2021)
- [Exploring Underexplored Limitations of Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05157/) (2021)
- [Grounded Adaptation for Zero-shot Executable Semantic Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.07396/) (2020)
- [Natural SQL: Making SQL Easier to Infer from Natural Language Specifications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05153/) (2021)
- [Dr.Spider: A Diagnostic Evaluation Benchmark towards Text-to-SQL Robustness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08881/) (2023)
- [Text-to-SQL in the Wild: A Naturally-Occurring Dataset Based on Stack Exchange Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.05006/) (2021)
- [Learning to Synthesize Data for Semantic Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05827/) (2021)
- [Data Augmentation with Hierarchical SQL-to-Question Generation for Cross-domain Text-to-SQL Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.02227/) (2021)
- [Importance of Synthesizing High-quality Data for Text-to-SQL Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08785/) (2022)
- [Towards Robustness of Text-to-SQL Models Against Natural and Realistic Adversarial Table Perturbation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09994/) (2022)
- [On Robustness of Neural Semantic Parsers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01563/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Disambiguate First, Parse Later: Generating Interpretations for Ambiguity Resolution in Semantic Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18448/) (2025)
- [Exploring the Landscape of Text-to-SQL with Large Language Models: Progresses, Challenges and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23838/) (2025)
- [Structural Deep Encoding for Table Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01457/) (2025)
- [LLM NL2SQL Robustness: Surface Noise vs. Linguistic Variation in Traditional and Agentic Settings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.17017/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-SQL semantic parsing has made significant progress in recent years, with various models demonstrating impressive performance on the challenging Spider benchmark. However, it has also been shown that these models often struggle to generalize even when faced with small perturbations of previously (accurately) parsed expressions. This is mainly due to the linguistic form of questions in Spider which are overly specific, unnatural, and display limited variation. In this work, we use data augmentation to enhance the robustness of text-to-SQL parsers against natural language variations. Existing approaches generate question reformulations either via models trained on Spider or only introduce local changes. In contrast, we leverage the capabilities of large language models to generate more realistic and diverse questions. Using only a few prompts, we achieve a two-fold increase in the number of questions in Spider. Training on this augmented dataset yields substantial improvements on a range of evaluation sets, including robustness benchmarks and out-of-domain data.