# Open-ended VQA benchmarking of Vision-Language models by exploiting Classification datasets and their semantic hierarchy

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07270 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07270/

## Key facts

- Cited by 26 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 39 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2024.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 39)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08485/) (2023)
- [BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12597/) (2023)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14198/) (2022)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15556/) (2022)
- [InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06500/) (2023)
- [Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.07332/) (2016)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [VQA: Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.00468/) (2015)
- [CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.5726/) (2014)
- [BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04696/) (2020)
- [SPICE: Semantic Propositional Image Caption Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.08822/) (2016)
- [EVA: Exploring the Limits of Masked Visual Representation Learning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.07636/) (2022)
- [LLaMA-Adapter V2: Parameter-Efficient Visual Instruction Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.15010/) (2023)
- [Visual Dialog](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.08669/) (2016)
- [BEiT v2: Masked Image Modeling with Vector-Quantized Visual Tokenizers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.06366/) (2022)
- [LVLM-eHub: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09265/) (2023)
- [To Ship or Not to Ship: An Extensive Evaluation of Automatic Metrics for Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.10821/) (2021)
- [Learning Compact Metrics for MT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06341/) (2021)
- [Tomayto, Tomahto. Beyond Token-level Answer Equivalence for Question Answering Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07654/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation Models: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.02567/) (2025)
- [VILA-M3: Enhancing Vision-Language Models with Medical Expert Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.12915/) (2024)
- [The First to Know: How Token Distributions Reveal Hidden Knowledge in Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09037/) (2024)
- [See It from My Perspective: How Language Affects Cultural Bias in Image Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11665/) (2024)
- [Reasoning-Enhanced Domain-Adaptive Pretraining of Multimodal Large Language Models for Short Video Content Governance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21486/) (2025)
- [Object Detection with Multimodal Large Vision-Language Models: An In-depth Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.19294/) (2025)
- [Towards Foundation Models for 3D Vision: How Close Are We?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10799/) (2024)
- [Directional Gradient Projection for Robust Fine-Tuning of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15895/) (2025)
- [Taxonomy-Aware Evaluation of Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05457/) (2025)
- [Video Question Answering for People with Visual Impairments Using an Egocentric 360-Degree Camera](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19794/) (2024)
- [Bridging vision language model (VLM) evaluation gaps with a framework for scalable and cost-effective benchmark generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15563/) (2025)
- [Beyond Accuracy: Benchmarking Cross-Task Consistency in Unified Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.25072/) (2026)
- [A Hitchhikers Guide to Fine-Grained Face Forgery Detection Using Common Sense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.00485/) (2024)
- [VF-Eval: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs for Generating Feedback on AIGC Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23693/) (2025)
- [The Artificial Intelligence Cognitive Examination: A Survey on the Evolution of Multimodal Evaluation from Recognition to Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04141/) (2025)
- [EgoVITA: Learning to Plan and Verify for Egocentric Video Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.18242/) (2025)
- [VRIQ: Benchmarking and Analyzing Visual-Reasoning IQ of VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.05382/) (2026)
- [MultiHaystack: Benchmarking Multimodal Retrieval and Reasoning over 40K Images, Videos, and Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.05697/) (2026)
- [Read or Ignore? A Unified Benchmark for Typographic-Attack Robustness and Text Recognition in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.11899/) (2025)
- [Aligning Large Vision-Language Models by Deep Reinforcement Learning and Direct Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.06759/) (2025)
- [FaithSCAN: Model-Driven Single-Pass Hallucination Detection for Faithful Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.00269/) (2026)
- [Patent Figure Classification using Large Vision-language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12751/) (2025)
- [FuzzingRL: Reinforcement Fuzz-Testing for Revealing VLM Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06600/) (2026)
- [Scalable Training of Spatially Grounded 2D Vision-Language Models for Radiology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20477/) (2026)
- [What Does Your Short-Answer VQA Score Actually Measure? Evaluator-Dependent Instability in Multimodal Short-Answer Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.10240/) (2026)
- [EgoErrorVQA: Assess Egocentric Comprehension Capabilities through Procedural Errors for Ego-Agentic AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.24134/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The evaluation of text-generative vision-language models is a challenging yet crucial endeavor. By addressing the limitations of existing Visual Question Answering (VQA) benchmarks and proposing innovative evaluation methodologies, our research seeks to advance our understanding of these models' capabilities. We propose a novel VQA benchmark based on well-known visual classification datasets which allows a granular evaluation of text-generative vision-language models and their comparison with discriminative vision-language models. To improve the assessment of coarse answers on fine-grained classification tasks, we suggest using the semantic hierarchy of the label space to ask automatically generated follow-up questions about the ground-truth category. Finally, we compare traditional NLP and LLM-based metrics for the problem of evaluating model predictions given ground-truth answers. We perform a human evaluation study upon which we base our decision on the final metric. We apply our benchmark to a suite of vision-language models and show a detailed comparison of their abilities on object, action, and attribute classification. Our contributions aim to lay the foundation for more precise and meaningful assessments, facilitating targeted progress in the exciting field of vision-language modeling.