# Tuning the feedback controller gains is a simple way to improve autonomous driving performance

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05064 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05064/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Cooperative and V2X driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving.
- Builds on 11 of its 19 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2024.

## Placed in

- End-to-end autonomous driving / [Cooperative and V2X driving](https://mlsanity.com/driving/cooperative-and-v2x-driving/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1406.1078/) (2014)
- [CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulator](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.03938/) (2017)
- [End to End Learning for Self-Driving Cars](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.07316/) (2016)
- [Trajectory-guided Control Prediction for End-to-end Autonomous Driving: A Simple yet Strong Baseline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08129/) (2022)
- [Safety-Enhanced Autonomous Driving Using Interpretable Sensor Fusion Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.14024/) (2022)
- [NEAT: Neural Attention Fields for End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.04456/) (2021)
- [Multimodal End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.03199/) (2019)
- [ReasonNet: End-to-End Driving with Temporal and Global Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10507/) (2023)
- [Pylot: A Modular Platform for Exploring Latency-Accuracy Tradeoffs in Autonomous Vehicles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.07830/) (2021)
- [Bounding the difference between model predictive control and neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06486/) (2022)
- [Predictive Control for Autonomous Driving with Uncertain, Multi-modal Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.20561/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Typical autonomous driving systems are a combination of machine learning algorithms (often involving neural networks) and classical feedback controllers. Whilst significant progress has been made in recent years on the neural network side of these systems, only limited progress has been made on the feedback controller side. Often, the feedback control gains are simply passed from paper to paper with little re-tuning taking place, even though the changes to the neural networks can alter the vehicle's closed loop dynamics. The aim of this paper is to highlight the limitations of this approach; it is shown that re-tuning the feedback controller can be a simple way to improve autonomous driving performance. To demonstrate this, the PID gains of the longitudinal controller in the TCP autonomous vehicle algorithm are tuned. This causes the driving score in CARLA to increase from 73.21 to 77.38, with the results averaged over 16 driving scenarios. Moreover, it was observed that the performance benefits were most apparent during challenging driving scenarios, such as during rain or night time, as the tuned controller led to a more assertive driving style. These results demonstrate the value of developing both the neural network and feedback control policies of autonomous driving systems simultaneously, as this can be a simple and methodical way to improve autonomous driving system performance and robustness.