# Measuring Machine Learning Harms from Stereotypes Requires Understanding Who Is Harmed by Which Errors in What Ways

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04420 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04420/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 43 of its 126 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 43)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1607.06520/) (2016)
- [Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.07187/) (2016)
- [Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06899/) (2022)
- [CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.00133/) (2020)
- [BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08193/) (2021)
- [Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00770/) (2023)
- [The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00982/) (2018)
- [Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07667/) (2020)
- [Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.09457/) (2017)
- [Dealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.05719/) (2021)
- [Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.03759/) (2022)
- [Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.08412/) (2017)
- ["Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.09219/) (2023)
- [Black is to Criminal as Caucasian is to Police: Detecting and Removing Multiclass Bias in Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.04047/) (2019)
- [REVISE: A Tool for Measuring and Mitigating Bias in Visual Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07999/) (2020)
- [Gender Bias in Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06001/) (2021)
- [On Measuring and Mitigating Biased Inferences of Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.09369/) (2019)
- [Understanding and Evaluating Racial Biases in Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.08503/) (2021)
- [Quantifying Social Biases in NLP: A Generalization and Empirical Comparison of Extrinsic Fairness Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.14574/) (2021)
- [On Measures of Biases and Harms in NLP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.03362/) (2021)
- [SeeGULL: A Stereotype Benchmark with Broad Geo-Cultural Coverage Leveraging Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11840/) (2023)
- [Attenuating Bias in Word Vectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.07656/) (2019)
- [Gender-preserving Debiasing for Pre-trained Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.00742/) (2019)
- [Mathematical Notions vs. Human Perception of Fairness: A Descriptive Approach to Fairness for Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.04783/) (2019)
- [Directional Bias Amplification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12594/) (2021)
- [Whose Ground Truth? Accounting for Individual and Collective Identities Underlying Dataset Annotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.04554/) (2021)
- [A Step Toward More Inclusive People Annotations for Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.02317/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [SEED-SET: Scalable Evolving Experimental Design for System-level Ethical Testing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.01630/) (2026)
- [Characterizing Cultural Localization in AI-Generated Stories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.14626/) (2026)
- [Beyond "I Can't Help With That": How Child Safety Experts Evaluate AI Chatbot Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.07902/) (2026)
- [Identifying Harm in Personalized, Generative AI Systems Requires User-Centered Auditing at the Interaction Level](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.14692/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As machine learning applications proliferate, we need an understanding of their potential for harm. However, current fairness metrics are rarely grounded in human psychological experiences of harm. Drawing on the social psychology of stereotypes, we use a case study of gender stereotypes in image search to examine how people react to machine learning errors. First, we use survey studies to show that not all machine learning errors reflect stereotypes nor are equally harmful. Then, in experimental studies we randomly expose participants to stereotype-reinforcing, -violating, and -neutral machine learning errors. We find stereotype-reinforcing errors induce more experientially (i.e., subjectively) harmful experiences, while having minimal changes to cognitive beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors. This experiential harm impacts women more than men. However, certain stereotype-violating errors are more experientially harmful for men, potentially due to perceived threats to masculinity. We conclude that harm cannot be the sole guide in fairness mitigation, and propose a nuanced perspective depending on who is experiencing what harm and why.