# Linguistic features for sentence difficulty prediction in ABSA

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03163 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03163/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 57 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [A Survey on Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis: Tasks, Methods, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.01054/) (2022)
- [BiasFinder: Metamorphic Test Generation to Uncover Bias for Sentiment Analysis Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01859/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Aspect-Based Sentiment Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.14266/) (2022)
- [Improving BERT Performance for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11731/) (2020)
- [A Dataset and BERT-based Models for Targeted Sentiment Analysis on Turkish Texts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.04185/) (2022)
- [Query Performance Prediction for Neural IR: Are We There Yet?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09947/) (2023)
- [A Study on the Ambiguity in Human Annotation of German Oral History Interviews for Perceived Emotion Recognition and Sentiment Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.06868/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

One of the challenges of natural language understanding is to deal with the subjectivity of sentences, which may express opinions and emotions that add layers of complexity and nuance. Sentiment analysis is a field that aims to extract and analyze these subjective elements from text, and it can be applied at different levels of granularity, such as document, paragraph, sentence, or aspect. Aspect-based sentiment analysis is a well-studied topic with many available data sets and models. However, there is no clear definition of what makes a sentence difficult for aspect-based sentiment analysis. In this paper, we explore this question by conducting an experiment with three data sets: "Laptops", "Restaurants", and "MTSC" (Multi-Target-dependent Sentiment Classification), and a merged version of these three datasets. We study the impact of domain diversity and syntactic diversity on difficulty. We use a combination of classifiers to identify the most difficult sentences and analyze their characteristics. We employ two ways of defining sentence difficulty. The first one is binary and labels a sentence as difficult if the classifiers fail to correctly predict the sentiment polarity. The second one is a six-level scale based on how many of the top five best-performing classifiers can correctly predict the sentiment polarity. We also define 9 linguistic features that, combined, aim at estimating the difficulty at sentence level.
