# Bias Mitigating Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00481 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00481/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05709/) (2020)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.07725/) (2016)
- [Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.08186/) (2020)
- [Dynamic Few-Shot Visual Learning without Forgetting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.09458/) (2018)
- [Open-Set Recognition: a Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You Need?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.06207/) (2021)
- [Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10956/) (2020)
- [Few-Shot Incremental Learning with Continually Evolved Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.03047/) (2021)
- [Forward Compatible Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.06953/) (2022)
- [Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting in Incremental Few-Shot Learning by Finding Flat Minima](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.01549/) (2021)
- [Neural Collapse Inspired Feature-Classifier Alignment for Few-Shot Class Incremental Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.03004/) (2023)
- [Constrained Few-shot Class-incremental Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.16588/) (2022)
- [Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning from an Open-Set Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.00147/) (2022)
- [Few-Shot Lifelong Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00991/) (2021)
- [Subspace Regularizers for Few-Shot Class Incremental Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07059/) (2021)
- [Learning with Fantasy: Semantic-Aware Virtual Contrastive Constraint for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.00426/) (2023)
- [Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning via Training-Free Prototype Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.05229/) (2023)
- [On the Soft-Subnetwork for Few-shot Class Incremental Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07529/) (2022)
- [Memorizing Complementation Network for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.05610/) (2022)
- [S3C: Self-Supervised Stochastic Classifiers for Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.02246/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Personalized Class Incremental Context-Aware Food Classification for Food Intake Monitoring Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06647/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Few-shot class-incremental learning (FSCIL) aims at recognizing novel classes continually with limited novel class samples. A mainstream baseline for FSCIL is first to train the whole model in the base session, then freeze the feature extractor in the incremental sessions. Despite achieving high overall accuracy, most methods exhibit notably low accuracy for incremental classes. Some recent methods somewhat alleviate the accuracy imbalance between base and incremental classes by fine-tuning the feature extractor in the incremental sessions, but they further cause the accuracy imbalance between past and current incremental classes. In this paper, we study the causes of such classification accuracy imbalance for FSCIL, and abstract them into a unified model bias problem. Based on the analyses, we propose a novel method to mitigate model bias of the FSCIL problem during training and inference processes, which includes mapping ability stimulation, separately dual-feature classification, and self-optimizing classifiers. Extensive experiments on three widely-used FSCIL benchmark datasets show that our method significantly mitigates the model bias problem and achieves state-of-the-art performance.