# CRUD-RAG: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.17043 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.17043/

## Key facts

- Cited by 50 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation.
- Builds on 40 of its 64 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2024.

## Placed in

- Retrieval-augmented generation / [RAG pipeline design and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/rag/rag-pipeline-design-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 40)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12712/) (2023)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10997/) (2023)
- [Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.03299/) (2022)
- [REPLUG: Retrieval-Augmented Black-Box Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12652/) (2023)
- [In-Context Retrieval-Augmented Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00083/) (2023)
- [MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07316/) (2022)
- [Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14627/) (2023)
- [KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.02252/) (2020)
- [Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10496/) (2022)
- [Active Retrieval Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06983/) (2023)
- [Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summaries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04228/) (2020)
- [Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Engines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.09848/) (2023)
- [FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03754/) (2020)
- [ARES: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09476/) (2023)
- [Measuring Attribution in Natural Language Generation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.12870/) (2021)
- [RECOMP: Improving Retrieval-Augmented LMs with Compression and Selective Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04408/) (2023)
- [QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12693/) (2021)
- [Promptagator: Few-shot Dense Retrieval From 8 Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11755/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models for Generative Information Extraction: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.17617/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Note: Enhancing Robustness in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09210/) (2023)
- [The Curious Case of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.06683/) (2021)
- [Rethinking with Retrieval: Faithful Large Language Model Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.00303/) (2022)
- [Asking Clarifying Questions in Open-Domain Information-Seeking Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.06554/) (2019)
- [Hierarchical Transformers for Multi-Document Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.13164/) (2019)
- [Large Language Model Is Not a Good Few-shot Information Extractor, but a Good Reranker for Hard Samples!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08559/) (2023)
- [Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08712/) (2020)
- [Lift Yourself Up: Retrieval-augmented Text Generation with Self Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02437/) (2023)
- [Open-Retrieval Conversational Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11364/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 50)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for AI-Generated Content: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.19473/) (2024)
- [LightRAG: Simple and Fast Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05779/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05257/) (2025)
- [Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07437/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Customized Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13958/) (2025)
- [RAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08067/) (2024)
- [Modular RAG: Transforming RAG Systems into LEGO-like Reconfigurable Frameworks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21059/) (2024)
- [UDA: A Benchmark Suite for Retrieval Augmented Generation in Real-world Document Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15187/) (2024)
- [LaRA: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Long-Context LLMs -- No Silver Bullet for LC or RAG Routing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.09977/) (2025)
- [Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14891/) (2025)
- [xFinder: Large Language Models as Automated Evaluators for Reliable Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.11874/) (2024)
- [Fine-tuning a Large Language Model for Automating Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.09602/) (2025)
- [Graph-based Approaches and Functionalities in Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10499/) (2025)
- [Meta-Chunking: Learning Text Segmentation and Semantic Completion via Logical Perception](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12788/) (2024)
- [CPA-RAG:Covert Poisoning Attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19864/) (2025)
- [RAS: Retrieval-And-Structuring for Knowledge-Intensive LLM Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.10996/) (2025)
- [InfoDeepSeek: Benchmarking Agentic Information Seeking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15872/) (2025)
- [PERMA: Benchmarking Personalized Memory Agents via Event-Driven Preference and Realistic Task Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.23231/) (2026)
- [Empowering Large Language Models to Set up a Knowledge Retrieval Indexer via Self-Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16933/) (2024)
- [KG-Retriever: Efficient Knowledge Indexing for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05547/) (2024)
- [Position: Text Embeddings Should Capture Implicit Semantics, Not Just Surface Meaning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08354/) (2025)
- [Multi-Source Knowledge Pruning for Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Benchmark and Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13694/) (2024)
- [Memory in Large Language Models: Mechanisms, Evaluation and Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18868/) (2025)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Purifier for Robust LLM-Empowered Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02458/) (2025)
- [Can LLMs Be Trusted for Evaluating RAG Systems? A Survey of Methods and Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.20119/) (2025)
- [TeaRAG: A Token-Efficient Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.05385/) (2025)
- [RAGRouter-Bench: A Dataset and Benchmark for Adaptive RAG Routing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.00296/) (2026)
- [Do Retrieval Augmented Language Models Know When They Don't Know?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.01476/) (2025)
- [CANDY: A Benchmark for Continuous Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search with Dynamic Data Ingestion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19651/) (2024)
- [ASTRID -- An Automated and Scalable TRIaD for the Evaluation of RAG-based Clinical Question Answering Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.08208/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a technique that enhances the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge sources. This method addresses common LLM limitations, including outdated information and the tendency to produce inaccurate "hallucinated" content. However, the evaluation of RAG systems is challenging, as existing benchmarks are limited in scope and diversity. Most of the current benchmarks predominantly assess question-answering applications, overlooking the broader spectrum of situations where RAG could prove advantageous. Moreover, they only evaluate the performance of the LLM component of the RAG pipeline in the experiments, and neglect the influence of the retrieval component and the external knowledge database. To address these issues, this paper constructs a large-scale and more comprehensive benchmark, and evaluates all the components of RAG systems in various RAG application scenarios. Specifically, we have categorized the range of RAG applications into four distinct types-Create, Read, Update, and Delete (CRUD), each representing a unique use case. "Create" refers to scenarios requiring the generation of original, varied content. "Read" involves responding to intricate questions in knowledge-intensive situations. "Update" focuses on revising and rectifying inaccuracies or inconsistencies in pre-existing texts. "Delete" pertains to the task of summarizing extensive texts into more concise forms. For each of these CRUD categories, we have developed comprehensive datasets to evaluate the performance of RAG systems. We also analyze the effects of various components of the RAG system, such as the retriever, the context length, the knowledge base construction, and the LLM. Finally, we provide useful insights for optimizing the RAG technology for different scenarios.