# GI-PIP: Do We Require Impractical Auxiliary Dataset for Gradient Inversion Attacks?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.11748 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11748/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 Jan 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03924/) (2018)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGAN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04958/) (2019)
- [Federated Learning with Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00582/) (2018)
- [Deep Leakage from Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08935/) (2019)
- [Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.14053/) (2020)
- [Memorizing Normality to Detect Anomaly: Memory-augmented Deep Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.02639/) (2019)
- [FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrapping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.13995/) (2020)
- [See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.07586/) (2021)
- [Gradient Inversion with Generative Image Prior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14962/) (2021)
- [Skip-GANomaly: Skip Connected and Adversarially Trained Encoder-Decoder Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08954/) (2019)
- [Auditing Privacy Defenses in Federated Learning via Generative Gradient Leakage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15696/) (2022)
- [Bayesian Framework for Gradient Leakage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.04706/) (2021)
- [Learning to Invert: Simple Adaptive Attacks for Gradient Inversion in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10880/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Exploring the Vulnerabilities of Federated Learning: A Deep Dive into Gradient Inversion Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.11514/) (2025)
- [Privacy Attack in Federated Learning is Not Easy: An Experimental Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19301/) (2024)
- [Upholding Robustness in Federated Learning: Trends, Emerging Strategies, and Research Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.28722/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Deep gradient inversion attacks expose a serious threat to Federated Learning (FL) by accurately recovering private data from shared gradients. However, the state-of-the-art heavily relies on impractical assumptions to access excessive auxiliary data, which violates the basic data partitioning principle of FL. In this paper, a novel method, Gradient Inversion Attack using Practical Image Prior (GI-PIP), is proposed under a revised threat model. GI-PIP exploits anomaly detection models to capture the underlying distribution from fewer data, while GAN-based methods consume significant more data to synthesize images. The extracted distribution is then leveraged to regulate the attack process as Anomaly Score loss. Experimental results show that GI-PIP achieves a 16.12 dB PSNR recovery using only 3.8% data of ImageNet, while GAN-based methods necessitate over 70%. Moreover, GI-PIP exhibits superior capability on distribution generalization compared to GAN-based methods. Our approach significantly alleviates the auxiliary data requirement on both amount and distribution in gradient inversion attacks, hence posing more substantial threat to real-world FL.