# Window Stacking Meta-Models for Clinical EEG Classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10283 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10283/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 9 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.02754/) (2016)
- [An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.01271/) (2018)
- [Efficient Training of Audio Transformers with Patchout](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.05069/) (2021)
- [Uncovering the structure of clinical EEG signals with self-supervised learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.16104/) (2020)
- [Machine-Learning-Based Diagnostics of EEG Pathology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.05115/) (2020)
- [ChronoNet: A Deep Recurrent Neural Network for Abnormal EEG Identification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.00308/) (2018)
- [EEG-GCNN: Augmenting Electroencephalogram-based Neurological Disease Diagnosis using a Domain-guided Graph Convolutional Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.12107/) (2020)
- [Robust learning from corrupted EEG with dynamic spatial filtering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.12916/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Windowing is a common technique in EEG machine learning classification and other time series tasks. However, a challenge arises when employing this technique: computational expense inhibits learning global relationships across an entire recording or set of recordings. Furthermore, the labels inherited by windows from their parent recordings may not accurately reflect the content of that window in isolation. To resolve these issues, we introduce a multi-stage model architecture, incorporating meta-learning principles tailored to time-windowed data aggregation. We further tested two distinct strategies to alleviate these issues: lengthening the window and utilizing overlapping to augment data. Our methods, when tested on the Temple University Hospital Abnormal EEG Corpus (TUAB), dramatically boosted the benchmark accuracy from 89.8 percent to 99.0 percent. This breakthrough performance surpasses prior performance projections for this dataset and paves the way for clinical applications of machine learning solutions to EEG interpretation challenges. On a broader and more varied dataset from the Temple University Hospital EEG Corpus (TUEG), we attained an accuracy of 86.7%, nearing the assumed performance ceiling set by variable inter-rater agreement on such datasets.