# Offline Imitation Learning by Controlling the Effective Planning Horizon

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.09728 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.09728/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Imitation learning methods, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data.
- Builds on 15 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2024.

## Placed in

- Offline RL and imitation learning from data / [Imitation learning methods](https://mlsanity.com/offlinerl/imitation-learning-methods/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.00028/) (2017)
- [Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.03476/) (2016)
- [D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07219/) (2020)
- [When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08253/) (2019)
- [Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11361/) (2019)
- [Discriminator-Actor-Critic: Addressing Sample Inefficiency and Reward Bias in Adversarial Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02925/) (2018)
- [Generative Adversarial Imitation from Observation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.06158/) (2018)
- [Imitation Learning via Off-Policy Distribution Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.05032/) (2019)
- [Imitation Learning as f-Divergence Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12888/) (2019)
- [OptiDICE: Offline Policy Optimization via Stationary Distribution Correction Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.10783/) (2021)
- [Error Bounds of Imitating Policies and Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11876/) (2020)
- [Versatile Offline Imitation from Observations and Examples via Regularized State-Occupancy Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.02433/) (2022)
- [LobsDICE: Offline Learning from Observation via Stationary Distribution Correction Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.13536/) (2022)
- [On the Role of Discount Factor in Offline Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.03383/) (2022)
- [Rethinking ValueDice: Does It Really Improve Performance?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.02468/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In offline imitation learning (IL), we generally assume only a handful of expert trajectories and a supplementary offline dataset from suboptimal behaviors to learn the expert policy. While it is now common to minimize the divergence between state-action visitation distributions so that the agent also considers the future consequences of an action, a sampling error in an offline dataset may lead to erroneous estimates of state-action visitations in the offline case. In this paper, we investigate the effect of controlling the effective planning horizon (i.e., reducing the discount factor) as opposed to imposing an explicit regularizer, as previously studied. Unfortunately, it turns out that the existing algorithms suffer from magnified approximation errors when the effective planning horizon is shortened, which results in a significant degradation in performance. We analyze the main cause of the problem and provide the right remedies to correct the algorithm. We show that the corrected algorithm improves on popular imitation learning benchmarks by controlling the effective planning horizon rather than an explicit regularization.