# The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05377 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05377/

## Key facts

- Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2023.

## Built on by (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Epistemological Fault Lines Between Human and Artificial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.19466/) (2025)
- [Surprising gender biases in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06003/) (2024)
- [Generative AI and Copyright: A Dynamic Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17801/) (2024)
- [Social physics in the age of artificial intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16900/) (2026)
- [A closer look at how large language models trust humans: patterns and biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15801/) (2025)
- [Generative AI Practices, Literacy, and Divides: An Empirical Analysis in the Italian Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.03671/) (2025)
- [Post-AGI Economies: Autonomy and the First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21216/) (2026)
- [AI advice suppresses people's willingness to say "I don't know", even when the advice is wrong and accuracy is incentivized](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.13562/) (2026)
- [Social Science Is Necessary for Operationalizing Socially Responsible Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16355/) (2024)
- [Designing Beyond Language: Sociotechnical Barriers in AI Health Technologies for Limited English Proficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.07277/) (2025)
- [Trust or Check? Understanding the (Evolutionary) Dynamics of User Trust in AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24742/) (2026)
- [In the Shadow of Smith`s Invisible Hand: Risks to Economic Stability and Social Wellbeing in the Age of Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01545/) (2024)
- [e-person Architecture and Framework for Human-AI Co-adventure Relationship](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.22181/) (2025)
- [Who is Responsible When AI Fails? Mapping Causes, Entities, and Consequences of AI Privacy and Ethical Incidents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.01029/) (2025)
- [People Are Highly Cooperative with Large Language Models, Especially When Communication Is Possible or Following Human Interaction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.18639/) (2025)
- [Real-World AI Evaluation: How FRAME Generates Systematic Evidence to Resolve the Decision-Maker's Dilemma](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.13294/) (2026)
- [Rethinking AI Literacy Education in Higher Education: Bridging Risk Perception and Responsible Adoption](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.29935/) (2026)
- [Generative AI impacts on intra-urban inequality and skill premium in Beijing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.25505/) (2026)
- [Mathematical Modelling of Ethical AI Use in Higher Education: A Coordination Game Framework for Future-Facing Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.27400/) (2026)
- [Gender bias across LLMs is common and highly heterogeneous](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.38036/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Generative artificial intelligence has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access, but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation. In the workplace, it can boost productivity and create new jobs, but the benefits will likely be distributed unevenly. In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide. In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities. In each section we cover a specific topic, evaluate existing research, identify critical gaps, and recommend research directions, including explicit trade-offs that complicate the derivation of a priori hypotheses. We conclude with a section highlighting the role of policymaking to maximize generative AI's potential to reduce inequalities while mitigating its harmful effects. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of existing policy frameworks in the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom, observing that each fails to fully confront the socioeconomic challenges we have identified. We propose several concrete policies that could promote shared prosperity through the advancement of generative AI. This article emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaborations to understand and address the complex challenges of generative AI.