# Decoupling Decision-Making in Fraud Prevention through Classifier Calibration for Business Logic Action

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05240 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05240/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 4 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Turning the Tables: Biased, Imbalanced, Dynamic Tabular Datasets for ML Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.13358/) (2022)
- [Don't Just Blame Over-parametrization for Over-confidence: Theoretical Analysis of Calibration in Binary Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.07856/) (2021)
- [Improving Data Quality with Training Dynamics of Gradient Boosting Decision Trees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11327/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Reinforcement-Guided Hyper-Heuristic Hyperparameter Optimization for Fair and Explainable Spiking Neural Network-Based Financial Fraud Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.16915/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning models typically focus on specific targets like creating classifiers, often based on known population feature distributions in a business context. However, models calculating individual features adapt over time to improve precision, introducing the concept of decoupling: shifting from point evaluation to data distribution. We use calibration strategies as strategy for decoupling machine learning (ML) classifiers from score-based actions within business logic frameworks. To evaluate these strategies, we perform a comparative analysis using a real-world business scenario and multiple ML models. Our findings highlight the trade-offs and performance implications of the approach, offering valuable insights for practitioners seeking to optimize their decoupling efforts. In particular, the Isotonic and Beta calibration methods stand out for scenarios in which there is shift between training and testing data.
