# Exploring Vulnerabilities of No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Models: A Query-Based Black-Box Method

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05217 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05217/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 27 of its 59 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2024.

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03924/) (2018)
- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Intriguing properties of neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6199/) (2013)
- [DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.04599/) (2015)
- [Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12396/) (2022)
- [Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.02697/) (2016)
- [Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similarity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07728/) (2020)
- [ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.03999/) (2017)
- [Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06978/) (2018)
- [Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.07277/) (2016)
- [Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02665/) (2019)
- [Simple Black-box Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07121/) (2019)
- [From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Quality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.10088/) (2019)
- [Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Quality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.02919/) (2015)
- [No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06858/) (2021)
- [Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.13983/) (2020)
- [QEBA: Query-Efficient Boundary-Based Blackbox Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14137/) (2020)
- [Image Quality Assessment using Contrastive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.13266/) (2021)
- [SparseFool: a few pixels make a big difference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.02248/) (2018)
- [Towards Large yet Imperceptible Adversarial Image Perturbations with Perceptual Color Distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02466/) (2019)
- [SurFree: a fast surrogate-free black-box attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.12807/) (2020)
- [GreedyFool: Distortion-Aware Sparse Adversarial Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.13773/) (2020)
- [Perceptual Attacks of No-Reference Image Quality Models with Human-in-the-Loop](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.00933/) (2022)
- [Image Quality Assessment for Perceptual Image Restoration: A New Dataset, Benchmark and Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.15002/) (2020)
- [Universal Perturbation Attack on Differentiable No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00366/) (2022)
- [Vulnerabilities in Video Quality Assessment Models: The Challenge of Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13609/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Cross-Modal Transferable Image-to-Video Attack on Video Quality Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.08415/) (2025)
- [Black-box Adversarial Attacks Against Image Quality Assessment Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17533/) (2024)
- [Guardians of Image Quality: Benchmarking Defenses Against Adversarial Attacks on Image Quality Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.01541/) (2024)
- [IOI: Invisible One-Iteration Adversarial Attack on No-Reference Image- and Video-Quality Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05955/) (2024)
- [Ti-Patch: Tiled Physical Adversarial Patch for no-reference video quality metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09961/) (2024)
- [Beyond Score Changes: Adversarial Attack on No-Reference Image Quality Assessment from Two Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13277/) (2024)
- [Secure Video Quality Assessment Resisting Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06866/) (2024)
- [SEGA: A Transferable Signed Ensemble Gaussian Black-Box Attack against No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18546/) (2025)
- [FS-IQA: Certified Feature Smoothing for Robust Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05516/) (2025)
- [Metaphor-based Jailbreak Attacks on Text-to-Image Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.10766/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

No-Reference Image Quality Assessment (NR-IQA) aims to predict image quality scores consistent with human perception without relying on pristine reference images, serving as a crucial component in various visual tasks. Ensuring the robustness of NR-IQA methods is vital for reliable comparisons of different image processing techniques and consistent user experiences in recommendations. The attack methods for NR-IQA provide a powerful instrument to test the robustness of NR-IQA. However, current attack methods of NR-IQA heavily rely on the gradient of the NR-IQA model, leading to limitations when the gradient information is unavailable. In this paper, we present a pioneering query-based black box attack against NR-IQA methods. We propose the concept of score boundary and leverage an adaptive iterative approach with multiple score boundaries. Meanwhile, the initial attack directions are also designed to leverage the characteristics of the Human Visual System (HVS). Experiments show our method outperforms all compared state-of-the-art attack methods and is far ahead of previous black-box methods. The effective NR-IQA model DBCNN suffers a Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient (SROCC) decline of 0.6381 attacked by our method, revealing the vulnerability of NR-IQA models to black-box attacks. The proposed attack method also provides a potent tool for further exploration into NR-IQA robustness.
