# MARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific Papers

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.04259 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04259/

## Key facts

- Cited by 104 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 20 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2024.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Web, search, and research agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/web-search-and-research-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05150/) (2020)
- [AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08155/) (2023)
- [MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00352/) (2023)
- [Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14325/) (2023)
- [Linformer: Self-Attention with Linear Complexity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.04768/) (2020)
- [LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14508/) (2023)
- [CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17760/) (2023)
- [Recursively Summarizing Books with Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.10862/) (2021)
- [Unleashing the Emergent Cognitive Synergy in Large Language Models: A Task-Solving Agent through Multi-Persona Self-Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.05300/) (2023)
- [Can large language models provide useful feedback on research papers? A large-scale empirical analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01783/) (2023)
- [ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00622/) (2023)
- [Retrieval meets Long Context Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03025/) (2023)
- [Recursively Summarizing Enables Long-Term Dialogue Memory in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.15022/) (2023)
- [ReviewRobot: Explainable Paper Review Generation based on Knowledge Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.06119/) (2020)
- [Writer-Defined AI Personas for On-Demand Feedback Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10433/) (2023)
- [ARIES: A Corpus of Scientific Paper Edits Made in Response to Peer Reviews](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.12587/) (2023)
- [Writing Tools: Looking Back to Look Ahead](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17894/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 104)

- [Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.06322/) (2025)
- [Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.04227/) (2025)
- [Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researchers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.04109/) (2024)
- [Magentic-One: A Generalist Multi-Agent System for Solving Complex Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04468/) (2024)
- [CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.00816/) (2024)
- [DeepReview: Improving LLM-based Paper Review with Human-like Deep Thinking Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08569/) (2025)
- [A Comprehensive Survey of Scientific Large Language Models and Their Applications in Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10833/) (2024)
- [From Individual to Society: A Survey on Social Simulation Driven by Large Language Model-based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03563/) (2024)
- [AgentRxiv: Towards Collaborative Autonomous Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18102/) (2025)
- [Paper2Code: Automating Code Generation from Scientific Papers in Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.17192/) (2025)
- [Large language models for automated scholarly paper review: A survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.10326/) (2025)
- [LLMs as Research Tools: A Large Scale Survey of Researchers' Usage and Perceptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.05025/) (2024)
- [Automated Hypothesis Validation with Agentic Sequential Falsifications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.09858/) (2025)
- [Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05151/) (2025)
- [ReviewAgents: Bridging the Gap Between Human and AI-Generated Paper Reviews](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08506/) (2025)
- [TreeReview: A Dynamic Tree of Questions Framework for Deep and Efficient LLM-based Scientific Peer Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07642/) (2025)
- [CHIME: LLM-Assisted Hierarchical Organization of Scientific Studies for Literature Review Support](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16148/) (2024)
- [The More You Automate, the Less You See: Hidden Pitfalls of AI Scientist Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.08713/) (2025)
- [AgentCoord: Visually Exploring Coordination Strategy for LLM-based Multi-Agent Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.11943/) (2024)
- [What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.06563/) (2024)
- [Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM Reviews](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.17086/) (2025)
- [Creativity in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21116/) (2025)
- [PeerQA: A Scientific Question Answering Dataset from Peer Reviews](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13668/) (2025)
- [Is Your Paper Being Reviewed by an LLM? Benchmarking AI Text Detection in Peer Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.19614/) (2025)
- [Detecting LLM-Generated Peer Reviews](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15772/) (2025)
- [AIGS: Generating Science from AI-Powered Automated Falsification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.11910/) (2024)
- [OmniScientist: Toward a Co-evolving Ecosystem of Human and AI Scientists](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.16931/) (2025)
- [Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS'24 Experiment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.03417/) (2024)
- [The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.04484/) (2025)
- [MIND: A Multi-agent Framework for Zero-shot Harmful Meme Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06908/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We study the ability of LLMs to generate feedback for scientific papers and develop MARG, a feedback generation approach using multiple LLM instances that engage in internal discussion. By distributing paper text across agents, MARG can consume the full text of papers beyond the input length limitations of the base LLM, and by specializing agents and incorporating sub-tasks tailored to different comment types (experiments, clarity, impact) it improves the helpfulness and specificity of feedback. In a user study, baseline methods using GPT-4 were rated as producing generic or very generic comments more than half the time, and only 1.7 comments per paper were rated as good overall in the best baseline. Our system substantially improves the ability of GPT-4 to generate specific and helpful feedback, reducing the rate of generic comments from 60% to 29% and generating 3.7 good comments per paper (a 2.2x improvement).