# State of What Art? A Call for Multi-Prompt LLM Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00595 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.00595/

## Key facts

- Cited by 310 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 27 of its 55 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02311/) (2022)
- [The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08691/) (2021)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11416/) (2022)
- [Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04615/) (2022)
- [BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05100/) (2022)
- [Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.09261/) (2022)
- [Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08207/) (2021)
- [Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14233/) (2023)
- [Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formatting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11324/) (2023)
- [Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08773/) (2021)
- [Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Labor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09689/) (2022)
- [Adversarial GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Robustness Evaluation of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02840/) (2021)
- [Demystifying Prompts in Language Models via Perplexity Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04037/) (2022)
- [On the Robustness of ChatGPT: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12095/) (2023)
- [Instruction Induction: From Few Examples to Natural Language Task Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10782/) (2022)
- [Measure and Improve Robustness in NLP Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08313/) (2021)
- [Efficient Benchmarking of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11696/) (2023)
- [Evaluating the Zero-shot Robustness of Instruction-tuned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11270/) (2023)
- [Robustness of Learning from Task Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.03813/) (2022)
- [Mind the instructions: a holistic evaluation of consistency and interactions in prompt-based learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13486/) (2023)
- [LMentry: A Language Model Benchmark of Elementary Language Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.02069/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 310)

- [tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14992/) (2024)
- [CRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03065/) (2024)
- [Lessons from the Trenches on Reproducible Evaluation of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14782/) (2024)
- [ProSA: Assessing and Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12405/) (2024)
- [WARM: On the Benefits of Weight Averaged Reward Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12187/) (2024)
- [When Benchmarks are Targets: Revealing the Sensitivity of Large Language Model Leaderboards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01781/) (2024)
- [ELEPHANT: Measuring and understanding social sycophancy in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13995/) (2025)
- [Homogenization Effects of Large Language Models on Human Creative Ideation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01536/) (2024)
- [Measuring what Matters: Construct Validity in Large Language Model Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.04703/) (2025)
- [The Good, The Bad, and The Greedy: Evaluation of LLMs Should Not Ignore Non-Determinism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10457/) (2024)
- [Let Me Speak Freely? A Study on the Impact of Format Restrictions on Performance of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.02442/) (2024)
- [Mind Your Format: Towards Consistent Evaluation of In-Context Learning Improvements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06766/) (2024)
- [Efficient multi-prompt evaluation of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17202/) (2024)
- [Can We Trust AI Benchmarks? An Interdisciplinary Review of Current Issues in AI Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06559/) (2025)
- [POSIX: A Prompt Sensitivity Index For Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02185/) (2024)
- [Beyond prompt brittleness: Evaluating the reliability and consistency of political worldviews in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.17649/) (2024)
- [LoRA Soups: Merging LoRAs for Practical Skill Composition Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13025/) (2024)
- [BIG5-CHAT: Shaping LLM Personalities Through Training on Human-Grounded Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16491/) (2024)
- [Social Bias Evaluation for Large Language Models Requires Prompt Variations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.03129/) (2024)
- [On the Worst Prompt Performance of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10248/) (2024)
- [Rating Roulette: Self-Inconsistency in LLM-As-A-Judge Frameworks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.27106/) (2025)
- [LLM Self-Correction with DeCRIM: Decompose, Critique, and Refine for Enhanced Following of Instructions with Multiple Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06458/) (2024)
- [Fluid Language Model Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.11106/) (2025)
- [K-QA: A Real-World Medical Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14493/) (2024)
- [Examining the robustness of LLM evaluation to the distributional assumptions of benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16966/) (2024)
- [Flaw or Artifact? Rethinking Prompt Sensitivity in Evaluating LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.01790/) (2025)
- [Teach Better or Show Smarter? On Instructions and Exemplars in Automatic Prompt Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15708/) (2024)
- [Knowledge Graphs, Large Language Models, and Hallucinations: An NLP Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.14258/) (2024)
- [JuStRank: Benchmarking LLM Judges for System Ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.09569/) (2024)
- [The Shrinking Landscape of Linguistic Diversity in the Age of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11266/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have led to the development of various evaluation benchmarks. These benchmarks typically rely on a single instruction template for evaluating all LLMs on a specific task. In this paper, we comprehensively analyze the brittleness of results obtained via single-prompt evaluations across 6.5M instances, involving 20 different LLMs and 39 tasks from 3 benchmarks. To improve robustness of the analysis, we propose to evaluate LLMs with a set of diverse prompts instead. We discuss tailored evaluation metrics for specific use cases (e.g., LLM developers vs. developers interested in a specific downstream task), ensuring a more reliable and meaningful assessment of LLM capabilities. We then implement these criteria and conduct evaluations of multiple models, providing insights into the true strengths and limitations of current LLMs.