# An Analysis of Embedding Layers and Similarity Scores using Siamese Neural Networks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00582 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.00582/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 12 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 Dec 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Enhancing Financial Sentiment Analysis via Retrieval Augmented Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.04027/) (2023)
- [Effective Transfer Learning for Identifying Similar Questions: Matching User Questions to COVID-19 FAQs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.13546/) (2020)
- [Energy Usage Reports: Environmental awareness as part of algorithmic accountability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08354/) (2019)
- [A Survey on Neural Network Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.03591/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Lanugage Models (LLMs) are gaining increasing popularity in a variety of use cases, from language understanding and writing to assistance in application development. One of the most important aspects for optimal funcionality of LLMs is embedding layers. Word embeddings are distributed representations of words in a continuous vector space. In the context of LLMs, words or tokens from the input text are transformed into high-dimensional vectors using unique algorithms specific to the model. Our research examines the embedding algorithms from leading companies in the industry, such as OpenAI, Google's PaLM, and BERT. Using medical data, we have analyzed similarity scores of each embedding layer, observing differences in performance among each algorithm. To enhance each model and provide an additional encoding layer, we also implemented Siamese Neural Networks. After observing changes in performance with the addition of the model, we measured the carbon footage per epoch of training. The carbon footprint associated with large language models (LLMs) is a significant concern, and should be taken into consideration when selecting algorithms for a variety of use cases. Overall, our research compared the accuracy different, leading embedding algorithms and their carbon footage, allowing for a holistic review of each embedding algorithm.