# Exploring the Sensitivity of LLMs' Decision-Making Capabilities: Insights from Prompt Variation and Hyperparameters

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.17476 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.17476/

## Key facts

- Cited by 32 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 22 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04615/) (2022)
- [Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14576/) (2022)
- [Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependencies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.01368/) (2016)
- [Auto-GPT for Online Decision Making: Benchmarks and Additional Opinions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02224/) (2023)
- [Neural Language Models as Psycholinguistic Subjects: Representations of Syntactic State](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.03260/) (2019)
- [An Empirical Study of the Non-determinism of ChatGPT in Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02828/) (2023)
- [Who is GPT-3? An Exploration of Personality, Values and Demographics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14338/) (2022)
- [Do large language models resemble humans in language use?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08014/) (2023)
- [The Machine Psychology of Cooperation: Can GPT models operationalise prompts for altruism, cooperation, competitiveness and selfishness in economic games?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07970/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [BetterBench: Assessing AI Benchmarks, Uncovering Issues, and Establishing Best Practices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.12990/) (2024)
- [LLMs Beyond English: Scaling the Multilingual Capability of LLMs with Cross-Lingual Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01771/) (2024)
- [Benchmarking Prompt Sensitivity in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06065/) (2025)
- [Generalization Bias in Large Language Model Summarization of Scientific Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00025/) (2025)
- [The Effectiveness of LLMs as Annotators: A Comparative Overview and Empirical Analysis of Direct Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.01299/) (2024)
- [The Better Angels of Machine Personality: How Personality Relates to LLM Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12344/) (2024)
- [Literature-Grounded Novelty Assessment of Scientific Ideas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.22026/) (2025)
- [An overview of model uncertainty and variability in LLM-based sentiment analysis. Challenges, mitigation strategies and the role of explainability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.04462/) (2025)
- [From Text to Emotion: Unveiling the Emotion Annotation Capabilities of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.17026/) (2024)
- [Inherent and emergent liability issues in LLM-based agentic systems: a principal-agent perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.03255/) (2025)
- [Explaining Large Language Models Decisions Using Shapley Values](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01332/) (2024)
- [One Persona, Many Cues, Different Results: How Sociodemographic Cues Impact LLM Personalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18572/) (2026)
- [Critical Foreign Policy Decisions (CFPD)-Benchmark: Measuring Diplomatic Preferences in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06263/) (2025)
- [Privacy Bias in Language Models: A Contextual Integrity-based Auditing Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.03735/) (2024)
- [Acquiescence Bias in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.08480/) (2025)
- [Evaluating and Enhancing Trustworthiness of LLMs in Perception Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.01433/) (2024)
- [Reinforcement Learning for Aligning Large Language Models Agents with Interactive Environments: Quantifying and Mitigating Prompt Overfitting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19920/) (2024)
- [GLaPE: Gold Label-agnostic Prompt Evaluation and Optimization for Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02408/) (2024)
- [PARC: A Quantitative Framework Uncovering the Symmetries within Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.14808/) (2025)
- [LLM Agents Are the Antidote to Walled Gardens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23978/) (2025)
- [Enhancing Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis with AI: Integrating Analytic Hierarchy Process and GPT-4 for Automated Decision Support](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07404/) (2024)
- [Irrelevant Alternatives Bias Large Language Model Hiring Decisions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.15299/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in Financial NLP: A Comparative Study on Financial Report Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.22936/) (2025)
- [HumanStudy-Bench: Towards AI Agent Design for Participant Simulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.00685/) (2026)
- [This Treatment Works, Right? Evaluating LLM Sensitivity to Patient Question Framing in Medical QA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.05051/) (2026)
- [GenCeption: Evaluate Vision LLMs with Unlabeled Unimodal Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14973/) (2024)
- [PATCH! {P}sychometrics-{A}ssis{T}ed Ben{CH}marking of Large Language Models against Human Populations: A Case Study of Proficiency in 8th Grade Mathematics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.01799/) (2024)
- [Eye Tracking Based Cognitive Evaluation of Automatic Readability Assessment Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11150/) (2025)
- [Assessing mentalization in humans and large language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.26291/) (2026)
- [Understanding Human Limits in Pattern Recognition: A Computational Model of Sequential Reasoning in Rock, Paper, Scissors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06503/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to their widespread use across a broad spectrum of tasks including decision making. Prior studies have compared the decision making abilities of LLMs with those of humans from a psychological perspective. However, these studies have not always properly accounted for the sensitivity of LLMs' behavior to hyperparameters and variations in the prompt. In this study, we examine LLMs' performance on the Horizon decision making task studied by Binz and Schulz (2023) analyzing how LLMs respond to variations in prompts and hyperparameters. By experimenting on three OpenAI language models possessing different capabilities, we observe that the decision making abilities fluctuate based on the input prompts and temperature settings. Contrary to previous findings language models display a human-like exploration exploitation tradeoff after simple adjustments to the prompt.
