# Concept-based Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Survey

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.12936 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.12936/

## Key facts

- Cited by 98 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 92 of its 153 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 92)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02907/) (2016)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07747/) (2017)
- [BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12086/) (2022)
- [Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.7766/) (2014)
- [Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05499/) (2023)
- [Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.04150/) (2015)
- [Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6034/) (2013)
- [Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1311.2901/) (2013)
- [Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10045/) (2019)
- [Deformable Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06211/) (2017)
- [Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.11279/) (2017)
- [Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.03292/) (2018)
- [ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.03975/) (2016)
- [Concept Bottleneck Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.04612/) (2020)
- [A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.01933/) (2018)
- [This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.10574/) (2018)
- [Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.05796/) (2017)
- [Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07538/) (2018)
- [A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.10758/) (2018)
- [Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragile](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10547/) (2017)
- [Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02508/) (2019)
- [European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.08813/) (2016)
- [The (Un)reliability of saliency methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00867/) (2017)
- [Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Nets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.13912/) (2020)
- [Language in a Bottle: Language Model Guided Concept Bottlenecks for Interpretable Image Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.11158/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 98)

- [BEARS Make Neuro-Symbolic Models Aware of their Reasoning Shortcuts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12240/) (2024)
- [A Neuro-Symbolic Benchmark Suite for Concept Quality and Reasoning Shortcuts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10368/) (2024)
- [Concept-Based Explanations in Computer Vision: Where Are We and Where Could We Go?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13456/) (2024)
- [Self-eXplainable AI for Medical Image Analysis: A Survey and New Outlooks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02331/) (2024)
- [Interpretable Concept-Based Memory Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15527/) (2024)
- [Causally Reliable Concept Bottleneck Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04363/) (2025)
- [Unsupervised Concept Drift Detection from Deep Learning Representations in Real-time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17813/) (2024)
- [If Concept Bottlenecks are the Question, are Foundation Models the Answer?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.19774/) (2025)
- [Shortcuts and Identifiability in Concept-based Models from a Neuro-Symbolic Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11245/) (2025)
- [VL-SAE: Interpreting and Enhancing Vision-Language Alignment with a Unified Concept Set](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.21323/) (2025)
- [Concept-Attention Whitening for Interpretable Skin Lesion Diagnosis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05997/) (2024)
- [Generating Counterfactual Trajectories with Latent Diffusion Models for Concept Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.10356/) (2024)
- [Towards Achieving Concept Completeness for Textual Concept Bottleneck Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11100/) (2025)
- [Addressing Concept Mislabeling in Concept Bottleneck Models Through Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18026/) (2025)
- [LICORICE: Label-Efficient Concept-Based Interpretable Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.15786/) (2024)
- [Representational Similarity via Interpretable Visual Concepts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15699/) (2025)
- [Understanding Multimodal Deep Neural Networks: A Concept Selection View](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08964/) (2024)
- [Interpretability for Time Series Transformers using A Concept Bottleneck Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06070/) (2024)
- [An Explainable Biomedical Foundation Model via Large-Scale Concept-Enhanced Vision-Language Pre-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.15579/) (2025)
- [A Comprehensive Survey on the Risks and Limitations of Concept-based Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04237/) (2025)
- [Actionable Interpretability Must Be Defined in Terms of Symmetries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.12913/) (2026)
- [Linearly-Interpretable Concept Embedding Models for Text Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14335/) (2024)
- [This Probably Looks Exactly Like That: An Invertible Prototypical Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12200/) (2024)
- [V-CEM: Bridging Performance and Intervenability in Concept-based Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.03978/) (2025)
- [C-SHAP for time series: An approach to high-level temporal explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11159/) (2025)
- [Towards Reasonable Concept Bottleneck Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05014/) (2025)
- [Interpretable Hierarchical Concept Reasoning through Attention-Guided Graph Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21102/) (2025)
- [Unveiling Decision-Making in LLMs for Text Classification : Extraction of influential and interpretable concepts with Sparse Autoencoders](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23951/) (2025)
- [On The Variability of Concept Activation Vectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24058/) (2025)
- [Nonparametric Identification of Latent Concepts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00136/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The field of explainable artificial intelligence emerged in response to the growing need for more transparent and reliable models. However, using raw features to provide explanations has been disputed in several works lately, advocating for more user-understandable explanations. To address this issue, a wide range of papers proposing Concept-based eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (C-XAI) methods have arisen in recent years. Nevertheless, a unified categorization and precise field definition are still missing. This paper fills the gap by offering a thorough review of C-XAI approaches. We define and identify different concepts and explanation types. We provide a taxonomy identifying nine categories and propose guidelines for selecting a suitable category based on the development context. Additionally, we report common evaluation strategies including metrics, human evaluations and dataset employed, aiming to assist the development of future methods. We believe this survey will serve researchers, practitioners, and domain experts in comprehending and advancing this innovative field.