# A Simple and Practical Method for Reducing the Disparate Impact of Differential Privacy

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11712 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11712/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 30 of its 62 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 30)

- [Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02413/) (2016)
- [Certifying and removing disparate impact](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.3756/) (2014)
- [Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.04884/) (2021)
- [Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Bounds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.02065/) (2016)
- [Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12101/) (2019)
- [RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Response](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1407.6981/) (2014)
- [Collecting Telemetry Data Privately](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.01524/) (2017)
- [Finite Sample Differentially Private Confidence Intervals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.03908/) (2017)
- [Winning the NIST Contest: A scalable and general approach to differentially private synthetic data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.04978/) (2021)
- [AIM: An Adaptive and Iterative Mechanism for Differentially Private Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12677/) (2022)
- [Benchmarking Differentially Private Synthetic Data Generation Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09238/) (2021)
- [Graphical-model based estimation and inference for differential privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.09136/) (2019)
- [CoinPress: Practical Private Mean and Covariance Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.06618/) (2020)
- [Private Mean Estimation of Heavy-Tailed Distributions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09464/) (2020)
- [Differential Privacy and Machine Learning: a Survey and Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.7584/) (2014)
- [Robust and Differentially Private Mean Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09159/) (2021)
- [Iterative Methods for Private Synthetic Data: Unifying Framework and New Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07153/) (2021)
- [Fair Decision Making using Privacy-Protected Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.12744/) (2019)
- [Differentially Private Query Release Through Adaptive Projection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.06641/) (2021)
- [Robin Hood and Matthew Effects: Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.11429/) (2021)
- [Differential Privacy and Fairness in Decisions and Learning Tasks: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.08187/) (2022)
- [New Oracle-Efficient Algorithms for Private Synthetic Data Release](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.05453/) (2020)
- [Private and polynomial time algorithms for learning Gaussians and beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.11320/) (2021)
- [Differentially Private Synthetic Data: Applied Evaluations and Enhancements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.05537/) (2020)
- [A Private and Computationally-Efficient Estimator for Unbounded Gaussians](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.04609/) (2021)
- [DP-SGD vs PATE: Which Has Less Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12576/) (2021)
- [Differentially Private Algorithms for Learning Mixtures of Separated Gaussians](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03951/) (2019)
- [The Impact of the U.S. Census Disclosure Avoidance System on Redistricting and Voting Rights Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14197/) (2021)
- [Private sampling: a noiseless approach for generating differentially private synthetic data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.14839/) (2021)
- [Epistemic Parity: Reproducibility as an Evaluation Metric for Differential Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.12700/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [Differentially Private Fair Binary Classifications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.15603/) (2024)
- [PFGuard: A Generative Framework with Privacy and Fairness Safeguards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02246/) (2024)
- [Differentially Private Random Feature Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04785/) (2024)
- [Rethinking Anonymity Claims in Synthetic Data Generation: A Model-Centric Privacy Attack Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.22434/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Differentially private (DP) mechanisms have been deployed in a variety of high-impact social settings (perhaps most notably by the U.S. Census). Since all DP mechanisms involve adding noise to results of statistical queries, they are expected to impact our ability to accurately analyze and learn from data, in effect trading off privacy with utility. Alarmingly, the impact of DP on utility can vary significantly among different sub-populations. A simple way to reduce this disparity is with stratification. First compute an independent private estimate for each group in the data set (which may be the intersection of several protected classes), then, to compute estimates of global statistics, appropriately recombine these group estimates. Our main observation is that naive stratification often yields high-accuracy estimates of population-level statistics, without the need for additional privacy budget. We support this observation theoretically and empirically. Our theoretical results center on the private mean estimation problem, while our empirical results center on extensive experiments on private data synthesis to demonstrate the effectiveness of stratification on a variety of private mechanisms. Overall, we argue that this straightforward approach provides a strong baseline against which future work on reducing utility disparities of DP mechanisms should be compared.
