# A Red Teaming Framework for Securing AI in Maritime Autonomous Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11500 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11500/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompt injection and agent security, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 46 of its 108 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2023.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Prompt injection and agent security](https://mlsanity.com/safety/prompt-injection-and-agent-security/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 46)

- [Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6572/) (2014)
- [Intriguing properties of neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6199/) (2013)
- [Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.05526/) (2017)
- [Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defenses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07204/) (2017)
- [Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.04508/) (2015)
- [One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.08864/) (2017)
- [Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.00792/) (2018)
- [Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.06605/) (2018)
- [DeepSurv: Personalized Treatment Recommender System Using A Cox Proportional Hazards Deep Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.00931/) (2016)
- [Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12470/) (2018)
- [Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoiser](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.02976/) (2017)
- [Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03691/) (2017)
- [On the Detection of Digital Face Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01717/) (2019)
- [The Creation and Detection of Deepfakes: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.11138/) (2020)
- [PRADA: Protecting against DNN Model Stealing Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.02628/) (2018)
- [Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.07769/) (2018)
- [MART: Improving LLM Safety with Multi-round Automatic Red-Teaming](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07689/) (2023)
- [DPatch: An Adversarial Patch Attack on Object Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.02299/) (2018)
- [Just How Toxic is Data Poisoning? A Unified Benchmark for Backdoor and Data Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.12557/) (2020)
- [Wild Patterns Reloaded: A Survey of Machine Learning Security against Training Data Poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.01992/) (2022)
- [I Know What You Trained Last Summer: A Survey on Stealing Machine Learning Models and Defences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.08451/) (2022)
- [Segment and Complete: Defending Object Detectors against Adversarial Patch Attacks with Robust Patch Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.04532/) (2021)
- [Adversarial Malware Binaries: Evading Deep Learning for Malware Detection in Executables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.04173/) (2018)
- [Exploiting Explanations for Model Inversion Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.12669/) (2021)
- [BadDet: Backdoor Attacks on Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14497/) (2022)
- [Backdoor Attacks against Transfer Learning with Pre-trained Deep Learning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.03274/) (2020)
- [Security Evaluation of Pattern Classifiers under Attack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.00609/) (2017)
- [The Threat of Offensive AI to Organizations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.15764/) (2021)
- [Satellite Communications in the New Space Era: A Survey and Future Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.08811/) (2020)
- [Role of Spatial Context in Adversarial Robustness for Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.00068/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Shall We Play a Game? Language Models for Open-ended Wargames](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17192/) (2025)
- [Preventing Adversarial AI Attacks Against Autonomous Situational Awareness: A Maritime Case Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21609/) (2025)
- [Toward Secure AI-Powered Penetration Testing Agents: Security Threats, Guardrails, and Architectural Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.16694/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence (AI) is being ubiquitously adopted to automate processes in science and industry. However, due to its often intricate and opaque nature, AI has been shown to possess inherent vulnerabilities which can be maliciously exploited with adversarial AI, potentially putting AI users and developers at both cyber and physical risk. In addition, there is insufficient comprehension of the real-world effects of adversarial AI and an inadequacy of AI security examinations; therefore, the growing threat landscape is unknown for many AI solutions. To mitigate this issue, we propose one of the first red team frameworks for evaluating the AI security of maritime autonomous systems. The framework provides operators with a proactive (secure by design) and reactive (post-deployment evaluation) response to securing AI technology today and in the future. This framework is a multi-part checklist, which can be tailored to different systems and requirements. We demonstrate this framework to be highly effective for a red team to use to uncover numerous vulnerabilities within a real-world maritime autonomous systems AI, ranging from poisoning to adversarial patch attacks. The lessons learned from systematic AI red teaming can help prevent MAS-related catastrophic events in a world with increasing uptake and reliance on mission-critical AI.
