# An Evaluation of GPT-4V and Gemini in Online VQA

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10637 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10637/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 12 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2023.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02255/) (2023)
- [MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02490/) (2023)
- [VizWiz Grand Challenge: Answering Visual Questions from Blind People](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08218/) (2018)
- [The Dawn of LMMs: Preliminary Explorations with GPT-4V(ision)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17421/) (2023)
- [Levels of AGI for Operationalizing Progress on the Path to AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.02462/) (2023)
- [On the Road with GPT-4V(ision): Early Explorations of Visual-Language Model on Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05332/) (2023)
- [A Systematic Evaluation of GPT-4V's Multimodal Capability for Medical Image Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.20381/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive Evaluation of GPT-4V on Knowledge-Intensive Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07536/) (2023)
- [Fully Authentic Visual Question Answering Dataset from Online Communities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.15562/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [LOVA3: Learning to Visual Question Answering, Asking and Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14974/) (2024)
- [Long-Form Answers to Visual Questions from Blind and Low Vision People](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.06303/) (2024)
- [Gemini in Reasoning: Unveiling Commonsense in Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.17661/) (2023)
- [Gemini Pro Defeated by GPT-4V: Evidence from Education](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08660/) (2023)
- [BBA: Bi-Modal Behavioral Alignment for Reasoning with Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13577/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While there is much excitement about the potential of large multimodal models (LMM), a comprehensive evaluation is critical to establish their true capabilities and limitations. In support of this aim, we evaluate two state-of-the-art LMMs, GPT-4V and Gemini, on a new visual question answering dataset sourced from an authentic online question answering community. We conduct fine-grained analysis by generating seven types of metadata for nearly 2,000 visual questions, such as image type and the required image processing capabilities. Our zero-shot performance analysis highlights the types of questions that are most challenging for both models, including questions related to "puzzling" topic, with "Identification" user intention, with "Sheet Music" image type, or labeled as "hard" by GPT-4.