# Early ChatGPT User Portrait through the Lens of Data

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10078 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.10078/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04023/) (2023)
- [How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07597/) (2023)
- [Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.13867/) (2023)
- [Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Engine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08745/) (2023)
- [A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.03494/) (2023)
- [Learning gain differences between ChatGPT and human tutor generated algebra hints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06871/) (2023)
- [ChatGPT and Software Testing Education: Promises & Perils](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.03287/) (2023)
- [Will ChatGPT get you caught? Rethinking of Plagiarism Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04335/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Intelligence per Watt: Measuring Intelligence Efficiency of Local AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.07885/) (2025)
- [Generative AI Agents in Autonomous Machines: A Safety Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15489/) (2024)
- [MMD-Flagger: Leveraging Maximum Mean Discrepancy to Detect Hallucinations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01367/) (2025)
- [Is Length Really A Liability? An Evaluation of Multi-turn LLM Conversations using BoolQ](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.16508/) (2026)
- [CUPID in the Model Zoo: Online Matchmaking for Selecting Your Dream LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.00846/) (2026)
- [The Privacy Fallacy of Crowdsourced Fine-Tuning: Extracting Proprietary Data via Topic-Based Poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33985/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Since its launch, ChatGPT has achieved remarkable success as a versatile conversational AI platform, drawing millions of users worldwide and garnering widespread recognition across academic, industrial, and general communities. This paper aims to point a portrait of early GPT users and understand how they evolved. Specific questions include their topics of interest and their potential careers; and how this changes over time. We conduct a detailed analysis of real-world ChatGPT datasets with multi-turn conversations between users and ChatGPT. Through a multi-pronged approach, we quantify conversation dynamics by examining the number of turns, then gauge sentiment to understand user sentiment variations, and finally employ Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to discern overarching topics within the conversation. By understanding shifts in user demographics and interests, we aim to shed light on the changing nature of human-AI interaction and anticipate future trends in user engagement with language models.
