# Risk-Aware Continuous Control with Neural Contextual Bandits

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.09961 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.09961/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1509.02971/) (2015)
- [Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.09477/) (2018)
- [A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06887/) (2017)
- [Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10044/) (2017)
- [Reward Constrained Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.11074/) (2018)
- [Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.06923/) (2018)
- [Deep Bayesian Bandits Showdown: An Empirical Comparison of Bayesian Deep Networks for Thompson Sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.09127/) (2018)
- [Bayesian Optimization with Safety Constraints: Safe and Automatic Parameter Tuning in Robotics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04450/) (2016)
- [Linear Stochastic Bandits Under Safety Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.05814/) (2019)
- [Bandits with concave rewards and convex knapsacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1402.5758/) (2014)
- [Neural Contextual Bandits with Deep Representation and Shallow Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.01780/) (2020)
- [Conservative Contextual Linear Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.06426/) (2016)
- [Worst Cases Policy Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.03618/) (2019)
- [Resourceful Contextual Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1402.6779/) (2014)
- [Thompson Sampling for Contextual Bandit Problems with Auxiliary Safety Constraints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.00638/) (2019)
- [Distributional Reinforcement Learning via Moment Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12354/) (2020)
- [Constrained Combinatorial Optimization with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11984/) (2020)
- [FALCON: An accurate real-time monitor for client-based mobile network data analytics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10110/) (2019)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Learning-Based Decision Making for Combustion Phasing Control in Multi-Fuel CI Engines with Latent Fuel Reactivity Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.18393/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in learning techniques have garnered attention for their applicability to a diverse range of real-world sequential decision-making problems. Yet, many practical applications have critical constraints for operation in real environments. Most learning solutions often neglect the risk of failing to meet these constraints, hindering their implementation in real-world contexts. In this paper, we propose a risk-aware decision-making framework for contextual bandit problems, accommodating constraints and continuous action spaces. Our approach employs an actor multi-critic architecture, with each critic characterizing the distribution of performance and constraint metrics. Our framework is designed to cater to various risk levels, effectively balancing constraint satisfaction against performance. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, we first compare it against state-of-the-art baseline methods in a synthetic environment, highlighting the impact of intrinsic environmental noise across different risk configurations. Finally, we evaluate our framework in a real-world use case involving a 5G mobile network where only our approach consistently satisfies the system constraint (a signal processing reliability target) with a small performance toll (8.5% increase in power consumption).
