# Discovering Highly Influential Shortcut Reasoning: An Automated Template-Free Approach

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.09718 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.09718/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2023.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.05426/) (2017)
- [Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07780/) (2020)
- [Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04730/) (2017)
- [Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckList](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.04118/) (2020)
- [Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.01007/) (2019)
- [Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.14599/) (2019)
- [Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02324/) (2018)
- [TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12421/) (2020)
- [Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.01042/) (2018)
- [Explaining Black Box Predictions and Unveiling Data Artifacts through Influence Functions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.06676/) (2020)
- [The Multilingual Amazon Reviews Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02573/) (2020)
- [Measure and Improve Robustness in NLP Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08313/) (2021)
- [Identifying and Mitigating Spurious Correlations for Improving Robustness in NLP Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07736/) (2021)
- [Combining Feature and Instance Attribution to Detect Artifacts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.00323/) (2021)
- [Are All Spurious Features in Natural Language Alike? An Analysis through a Causal Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.14011/) (2022)
- [Beyond Leaderboards: A survey of methods for revealing weaknesses in Natural Language Inference data and models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14709/) (2020)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [The Knowledge-Reasoning Dissociation: Fundamental Limitations of LLMs in Clinical Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10777/) (2025)
- [mSCoRe: a Multilingual and Scalable Benchmark for Skill-based Commonsense Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10137/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Shortcut reasoning is an irrational process of inference, which degrades the robustness of an NLP model. While a number of previous work has tackled the identification of shortcut reasoning, there are still two major limitations: (i) a method for quantifying the severity of the discovered shortcut reasoning is not provided; (ii) certain types of shortcut reasoning may be missed. To address these issues, we propose a novel method for identifying shortcut reasoning. The proposed method quantifies the severity of the shortcut reasoning by leveraging out-of-distribution data and does not make any assumptions about the type of tokens triggering the shortcut reasoning. Our experiments on Natural Language Inference and Sentiment Analysis demonstrate that our framework successfully discovers known and unknown shortcut reasoning in the previous work.